On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 15:28, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> I haven't tested it, but replacing the one_cmpqi2 insn pattern
> in 2.95 with this new expander should work, and fix the bug.
Compiling with gcc-3.0 also works :-)
Adam
Adam Thornton wrote:
>mess/machine/serial.c:779: Unable to generate reloads for:
>(insn 42 29 44 (parallel[
>(set (mem/s:QI (plus:SI (reg:SI 1 %r1)
>(const_int 2 [0x2])) 0)
>(not:QI (mem/s:QI (plus:SI (reg:SI 3 %r3)
>(
:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: GCC bug?
I hate to drag the focus away from cigars and surrealism, but I got the
following error today:
For starters, gcc 2.95.4 prerelease, so there is certainly a newer one,
but this is what's in Debian/390:
debian2:/usr/local/src/xmame-0.72.1/src/unix
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 01:12:56PM -0500, Adam Thornton wrote:
> For starters, gcc 2.95.4 prerelease, so there is certainly a newer one,
> but this is what's in Debian/390:
It's definitely a gcc bug.
Debian/390 also ships with gcc 3.0, so you can try that very easily and see
I hate to drag the focus away from cigars and surrealism, but I got the
following error today:
For starters, gcc 2.95.4 prerelease, so there is certainly a newer one,
but this is what's in Debian/390:
debian2:/usr/local/src/xmame-0.72.1/src/unix# gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/s390-li
