Re: Linux LPAR install on MP3000 - LCS definition

2002-06-12 Thread Alan Altmark
On Wednesday, 06/12/2002 at 10:58ZE10, Vic Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12.06.2002 at 07:19:52, Rob van der Heij [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On real OSA devices the number is ignored afaik. Yep. This is because on OSA, each port is its own LCS device which only has port '0'. So the

Re: Linux LPAR install on MP3000 - LCS definition

2002-06-12 Thread Vic Cross
On 13.06.2002 at 00:45:18, Alan Altmark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wednesday, 06/12/2002 at 10:58ZE10, Vic Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yep. This is because on OSA, each port is its own LCS device which only has port '0'. So the default (0) is fine. Unless it is a dual-port

Linux LPAR install on MP3000 - LCS definition

2002-06-11 Thread Ira Hochner
I am currently trying to install the latest version of Suse Linux (2.4 kernel) in an LPAR and having trouble defining the ethernet card. The machine is a MP3000 H30 with 3 LPARs with 3 ethernet cards and 1 token ring card. LPAR 1: VSE had TR card dedicated to it. LPAR 2: not in use

Re: Linux LPAR install on MP3000 - LCS definition

2002-06-11 Thread Rob van der Heij
I found the MP3000 (and P/390 too) very sensitive to proper 'relative adapter number' for the adapter. You need the number as defined in MPTS or LAPS (?) and letting the lcs.o driver sense them crashed my AWS3172 device driver. On real OSA devices the number is ignored afaik. Rob