On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:43:15 -0500, Post, Mark K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One thing you're "missing" is that by using that export DISPLAY command,
> you're not using the SSH tunnel, and losing the value of the encryption that
> SSH provides.
And you might want to look into the client configura
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John
Kaba
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 5:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux Performance Issue
Update on the SuSE SLES 8 performance Issue:
KDE was just turned on to configure the various components(DB2, etc),
we
are
eaper than what
you're running now, and it has had lots of changes made to enhance the
running of Linux guests.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
Kaba
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 5:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: R
f Kohrs,
Steven
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 9:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Linux Performance Issue
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 16:24, Tom Duerbusch wrote:
> But after the product is installed, then bring down KDE!
>
> I think a year or so ago, DB2/UDB required a gui screen for
o:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: Linux oncc:
390 Port Subject: Re: [LINUX-390] Linux
Performance Issue
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IST.EDU>
11/17/2004 10:45
On Wednesday, 11/17/2004 at 09:21 EST, "Mrohs, Ray"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only time we saw idle SLES8 instances hog a system is when we
brought up our
> z/VM 4.3 and it's guests under a 4.2 1st level at our DR site. 12 Linux
> instances
> pegged the CPU at 100%. We replaced the 1st level
On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 16:24, Tom Duerbusch wrote:
> But after the product is installed, then bring down KDE!
>
> I think a year or so ago, DB2/UDB required a gui screen for the install
> (just to ask one question).
>
What am I missing here? I run X applications (DB2 installs, GSKit
iKeyman, ldap
04 3:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linux Performance Issue
We have just recently installed SuSE SLES8 under our VM3.1.0 system, and
are experiencing some performance issues. Our Realtime monitor reveals
that Linux is utilizing approx 65% of our CPU cycles, but we really have
nothing runni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IST.EDU> Subject
Re: Linux Performance Issue
11/16/2004 04:24
PM
Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 04:24:23PM -0600, Tom Duerbusch wrote:
> KDE?
>
> Yep, you can run it, but everytime I bring up KDE, it takes about 40%
> of our 60 MIP processor. There is very little that you ever need a
> desktop manager for that can't be done via command line. But it is
> really nice
KDE?
Yep, you can run it, but everytime I bring up KDE, it takes about 40%
of our 60 MIP processor. There is very little that you ever need a
desktop manager for that can't be done via command line. But it is
really nice to have as a fall back to install some product.
But after the product is i
ROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Re: Linux Performance Issue
We are now messing with VM Page Space.
I too have see major slowness with my SLES 8 Guest. Our VM guy has
increased the Page Space, I'm checking it out now.
- Original Message -
From: "John Kaba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
Update on the SuSE SLES 8 performance Issue:
KDE was just turned on to configure the various components(DB2, etc), we
are using runlevel 3. I have since turned KDE off, I have reduced the
Virtual memory on the Linux guest machine to 384MB, and set timer ticks to
0. I shutdown Linux, logged off t
We are now messing with VM Page Space.
I too have see major slowness with my SLES 8 Guest. Our VM guy has increased
the Page Space, I'm checking it out now.
- Original Message -
From: "John Kaba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linux P
/16/2004 04:39 PM -
Adam Thornton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mine.net>cc:
Sent by: Linux onSubject: Re: [LINUX-390] Linux
Performance Issue
390 Port
Setting the
kernel.hz_timer = 0
in the /etc/sysctl
will probably help at least some but your probably going to have to do a
detailed memory analysis to see how much memory is REALLY needed with DB2
in their 1GB might be the real number but my gut feel is thats WAY too
large..
One word. Well, two. KDE. Don't.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John
Kaba
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 3:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linux Performance Issue
We have just recently installed SuSE SLES8
On Nov 16, 2004, at 2:58 PM, John Kaba wrote:
We have just recently installed SuSE SLES8 under our VM3.1.0 system,
and
are experiencing some performance issues. Our Realtime monitor reveals
that Linux is utilizing approx 65% of our CPU cycles, but we really
have
nothing running. I was told by our
We have just recently installed SuSE SLES8 under our VM3.1.0 system, and
are experiencing some performance issues. Our Realtime monitor reveals
that Linux is utilizing approx 65% of our CPU cycles, but we really have
nothing running. I was told by our Linux guy to give it lots of memory, so
I def
I've been working with a few installations with less than
stellar performance. Seems like NFS under linux is a culprit.
As well as VM and it's 2GB constraints.
This site set a new world record at 300,000 diagnoses
per second per processor. Look at the first report at
the system overhead as file ba
20 matches
Mail list logo
