>From another list...
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 23:00:02 -0500
From: Declan McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FC: CBDTPA bans everything from two-line BASIC programs to PCs
Just in case folks haven't figured out how sweeping the Hol
> I vaguely recall a braindead plan to add a very faint barcode "watermark" to every
>document copy. When they tested, they realized that when a document was
>serial-copied over and over, the watermarks
> eventually drowned out not only each other, but the original text.
This is done for high
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: March 26, 2002 1:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: New copyright bill could mean the death of Linux...
>
>
> > I look forward to the outlawing of Xerox machines - and
> indeed ballpoint
> > pens ("any hardware that can
rk Post
-Original Message-
From: Phil Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 3:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New copyright bill could mean the death of Linux...
-snip-
Frankly, given the relevance of the First Amendment to so many aspects of
this, I am surprised it's got this far.
When Linux is outlawed only outlaws will have Linux... Am I in
the right lobby?
Dennis.
> Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 20:36:45 -0500
> From: "Graeme St. Clair" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: New copyright bill could mean the death of Linux...
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Post, Mark K wrote:
> a lot of Senator Hollings' fellow Republicans aren't too happy with this
> bill either.
Hollings is a Democrat, not that party lines really have anything do with
this issue though. Apparently more than anyth
Our Xerox machine is certainly digital. It can fax, email, scan, ect.
Should be a good trick to make it comply.
Scott Ledbetter
-Original Message-
From: Phil Payne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: March 26, 2002 1:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New copyright bill could mean
-
From: Graeme St. Clair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 8:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New copyright bill could mean the death of Linux...
I look forward to the outlawing of Xerox machines - and indeed ballpoint
pens ("any hardware that can reproduce
copyri
> I look forward to the outlawing of Xerox machines - and indeed ballpoint
> pens ("any hardware that can reproduce
> copyrighted material").
I think it has to be a 'digital' device. Most new cameras, of course, are digital.
'Device' could be open to interpretation. I use a 1GB IBM Microdrive
gt;
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 11:22 AM
Subject: New copyright bill could mean the death of Linux...
> http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,51274,00.html
>
> The basic jist of the bill would mean that any software or hardware that
> didn't include
On Monday 25 March 2002 11:53 am, Peter Webb, Toronto Transit Commission wrote:
> This bill is being pushed by the lap dog of the MPAA and RIAA, who have
> lots of money for lobbying. For an interesting take on this subject, see
> the strips for the last week at http://www.userfriendly.org/static/
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Doug Fuerst wrote:
> What, is Osama bin Laden behind this
Probably. Let's bomb out the US to make sure he doesn't survive ;). SCNR
--
This message is provided to you under the terms outlined at
http://www.bero.org/terms.html
Meanwhile ... At the Oscars,
Robert Redford proclaims "freedom". [sigh]
What, is Osama bin Laden behind this This will destroy America as well
as anything he's doing. This idiocy has to be stopped. All for these twits
in Hollywood. Time to band together.
At 07:30 PM 3/25/2002 +0100, you wrote:
>Am Mon, 2002-03-25 um 18.33 schrieb Alan Cox:
> > > Robert P. Nix
2835 (voice/fax)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Holger Baxmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
om> cc:
Sent by: Linux onSubject: Re: New copyright bill could
mean
Am Mon, 2002-03-25 um 18.33 schrieb Alan Cox:
> > Robert P. Nixinternet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Mayo Clinic phone: 507-284-0844
>
> Note its all digital devices capable of copying basically. That as has been
> pointed out already includes
> Robert P. Nixinternet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mayo Clinic phone: 507-284-0844
Note its all digital devices capable of copying basically. That as has been
pointed out already includes everything from newer wristwatches through all
kinds o
> http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,51274,00.html
>
> The basic jist of the bill would mean that any software or hardware that
> didn't include a government approved form of copy protection could not be
> distributed within the United States. No software from outside the US could
> be lega
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 11:45 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: New copyright bill could mean the death of Linux...
>
> > http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,51274,00.html
> >
> > The basic jist of the bill would mean that any software o
http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,51274,00.html
The basic jist of the bill would mean that any software or hardware that
didn't include a government approved form of copy protection could not be
distributed within the United States. No software from outside the US could
be legally importe
20 matches
Mail list logo
