On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 16:54, Yogish wrote:
Hi
Is there any other alternative to modifying or rewriting the compiler file.
I would rather be able to use some tool and make the binaries work. The
compiler file for mumps is a huge file.
Regards
You probably could run Bochs, run Linux inside of
If anyone is interested, GT.M can be found on sourceforge:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sanchez-gtm
It is DEFINITELY not portable to s390 without a LOT of work since there's a
lot of i386 assembler routines.
:32:51PM -0700, Yogish wrote:
Hi
We do have the source of the mumps compiler and it is written in C language
.
Yogish
- Original Message -
From: Adam Thornton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: Porting Problems
On Tue
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 16:28, Yogish wrote:
Hi all
I am having problems porting GT.M application (MUMPS compiler +database) from an
intel platform to s390 system. All the binaries and compiler are written for intel
platform. I was wondering if there any other solution to it than rewriting
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 16:32, Yogish wrote:
Hi
We do have the source of the mumps compiler and it is written in C language
Then it seems very unlikely you will have to rewrite the whole thing.
At worst, you will probably have to fix little-endian assumptions;
you're in luck in that the word size
Is there any other alternative to modifying or rewriting the
compiler file.
I would rather be able to use some tool and make the binaries
work. The
compiler file for mumps is a huge file.
If the compiler produces x86 object code directly, you have no other
alternative than to rewrite the
: Porting Problems
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 15:52, Fargusson.Alan wrote:
Except that it looks like the M compiler (MUMPS compiler) is actually
a compiler for the x86. This won't be useful on a S/390. Retargeting
a compiler is hard work. Too bad this wasn't created as part of the
GNU compiler suite
On Maw, 2003-08-05 at 22:13, Dave Jones wrote:
There seems to be a GPL MUMPS implementation at:
http://www.cs.uni.edu/~okane/
Good luck.
It builds and runs fine on S/390. I have RPMs for it even 8)
- Original Message -
From: Yogish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: Porting Problems
Hi
Is there any other alternative to modifying or rewriting the compiler
file.
I would rather be able to use some tool and make the binaries
Hi
We do have the source of the mumps compiler and it is written in C language
.
Yogish
- Original Message -
From: Adam Thornton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: Porting Problems
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 16:28, Yogish wrote:
Hi
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 1:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Porting Problems
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 16:32, Yogish wrote:
Hi
We do have the source of the mumps compiler and it is written in C
language
Then it seems very unlikely you will have to rewrite the whole thing
There seems to be a GPL MUMPS implementation at:
http://www.cs.uni.edu/~okane/
Good luck.
Dave Jones
Sine Nomine Associates
Houston
- Original Message -
From: Adam Thornton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 4:01 PM
Subject: Re: Porting Problems
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 15:52, Fargusson.Alan wrote:
Except that it looks like the M compiler (MUMPS compiler) is actually a
compiler for the x86. This won't be useful on a S/390. Retargeting a
compiler is hard work. Too bad this wasn't created as part of the GNU
compiler suite.
Oy. Yeah,
Hi all
I am having problems porting GT.M application (MUMPS compiler +database) from an
intel platform to s390 system. All the binaries and compiler are written for intel
platform. I was wondering if there any other solution to it than rewriting the entire
compiler for s390.
waiting for your
Then it seems very unlikely you will have to rewrite the
whole thing. At worst, you will probably have to fix
little-endian assumptions; you're in luck in that the word
size will not change. So mostly it'll be a matter of making
sure that your data type definitions match up, and then
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Adam Thornton wrote:
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 15:57:53 -0500
From: Adam Thornton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Linux on 390 Port [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Porting Problems
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 15:52, Fargusson.Alan wrote:
Except that it looks
On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Adam Thornton wrote:
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 15:57:53 -0500
From: Adam Thornton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Linux on 390 Port [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Porting Problems
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 15:52, Fargusson.Alan wrote:
Except that it looks
17 matches
Mail list logo
