Re: Really silly SSH question.

2005-04-18 Thread Benjamin White
@VM.MARIST.EDU To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Really silly SSH question. Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:11:13 -0500 Just for grins and giggles, I created an SSH private key/public key pair. I can now use PuTTY to logon to Linux without using my Linux password. Instead, I must use a Passphrase. What

Re: Really silly SSH question.

2005-04-16 Thread Phil Howard
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 01:11:13PM -0500, McKown, John wrote: | Just for grins and giggles, I created an SSH private key/public key | pair. I can now use PuTTY to logon to Linux without using my Linux | password. Instead, I must use a Passphrase. What have I gained? I did | replace my password

Re: Really silly SSH question.

2005-04-16 Thread Rob van der Heij
The most significant thing imho is that you separate authentication (by showing your private key) and access control (the system holding a list of public keys that are valid for access). You only need one passphrase to decode your private key and can use that for all systems that you logon to,

Really silly SSH question.

2005-04-14 Thread McKown, John
Just for grins and giggles, I created an SSH private key/public key pair. I can now use PuTTY to logon to Linux without using my Linux password. Instead, I must use a Passphrase. What have I gained? I did replace my password with a passphrase, but how is that more secure? I don't see a way to say:

Re: Really silly SSH question.

2005-04-14 Thread Rod Clayton
I have never tried this, but I believe if you don't specify a passphrase your private key is not encrypted on the HD and you won't be prompted for it. Have you tried generating a pair without giving a passphrase? Rod On 4/14/05, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just for grins and giggles,

Re: Really silly SSH question.

2005-04-14 Thread McKown, John
-Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rod Clayton Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 1:24 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Really silly SSH question. I have never tried this, but I believe if you don't specify a passphrase

Re: Really silly SSH question.

2005-04-14 Thread Tiago Antão
Hi, On 4/14/05, McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: password. Instead, I must use a Passphrase. What have I gained? I did replace my password with a passphrase, but how is that more secure? I A passphrase is a password to access your private LOCAL key. The passph is used locally to access

Re: Really silly SSH question.

2005-04-14 Thread Post, Mark K
. Mark Post -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McKown, John Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 1:11 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Really silly SSH question. Just for grins and giggles, I created an SSH private key/public key pair. I

Re: Really silly SSH question.

2005-04-14 Thread Fargusson.Alan
this information then you will need to type something every time. -Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of McKown, John Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 11:28 AM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Really silly SSH question. -Original Message

Really silly SSH question.

2005-04-14 Thread Sal Torres/SBC Inc.
*** Reply to note of Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:11:13 -0500 (EST/CDT) *** by LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU You would add your passphrase to PuTTY's pagent? Sal McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Just for grins and giggles, I created an SSH private key/public key pair. I can now use PuTTY to logon to

Re: Really silly SSH question.

2005-04-14 Thread Adam Thornton
On Apr 14, 2005, at 1:11 PM, McKown, John wrote: Just for grins and giggles, I created an SSH private key/public key pair. I can now use PuTTY to logon to Linux without using my Linux password. Instead, I must use a Passphrase. What have I gained? I did replace my password with a passphrase, but

Re: Really silly SSH question.

2005-04-14 Thread McKown, John
-Original Message- From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fargusson.Alan Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 1:36 PM To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Really silly SSH question. I see a flaw in your logic here. If you don't want to type anything

Re: Really silly SSH question.

2005-04-14 Thread Post, Mark K
Subject: Re: Really silly SSH question. -snip- Now to see how to setup SSH on the server to disallow passwords, as indicated in another message. -- For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL

Re: Really silly SSH question.

2005-04-14 Thread David Boyes
- Original Message - From: McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 2:11 PM Subject: Really silly SSH question. Just for grins and giggles, I created an SSH private key/public key pair. I can now use PuTTY to logon to Linux without using

Re: Really silly SSH question.

2005-04-14 Thread David Boyes
For added security you can also have your key on a physical smart card (in that case you need a card reader on your PC). Then a cracker will need both your card and the passph. This is a great way to use small-size USB memory drives, BTW. If you're clever about it, you can also store other

Re: Really silly SSH question.

2005-04-14 Thread Richard Troth
Instead, I must use a Passphrase. What have I gained? John ... I'm not a security expert, but I believe those who are would put it something like this: You have more security now because there are TWO things required for you to connect to the remote system: what you KNOW (same as

Re: Really silly SSH question.

2005-04-14 Thread Istvan Nemeth
If you use PuTTY on Windows you can install Pageant (this is included in the installer package), and load your key (and type your passpharse) only _one time_ (when Pageant is running), and than you can logon to every system without passwords. Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU rta