-
De: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de
Scully, William P
Enviado el: martes, 16 de agosto de 2005 18:13
Para: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Asunto: SLES 9 in an LPAR
I'm having a performance problem.
I was asked to install SLES 9 64-bit into an LPAR. To create the server
I got
I'm having a performance problem.
I was asked to install SLES 9 64-bit into an LPAR. To create the server
I got my hands on the needed DASD and conducted the install of Linux
under z/VM. The virtual hardware configuration (DASD and OSA addresses)
were specified as would be used on the LPAR.
What weight has the LPAR been assigned as compared to the other LPARs?
Is the LPAR capped or able to obtain CPU cycles dynamically when available?
David
Scully, William P wrote:
I'm having a performance problem.
I was asked to install SLES 9 64-bit into an LPAR. To create the server
I got my
First guess is that the LPAR has more devices defined to it than it will
use, and it's running through addresses - to see what's there. Make
sure that only what it's supposed to use is defined.
However when I attempt to start this copy of Linux in an LPAR
(512M and one dedicated CPU in
like this taking 15-20 minutes.
Regards,
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Scully, William P
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 9:13 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: SLES 9 in an LPAR
I'm having a performance problem.
I was asked
Whether or not you limit the DASD range in zipl.conf it will still do a
store subchannel and sense id for each of the devices it can find for
the active IOCDS. If it's trying to do sense id (maybe even read device
characteristics, I can't recall) for heavily used devices on other LPARs
you could
I wondering how many devices are defined to the LPAR in the IOCDS. Any
idea?
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Scully, William P
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 12:13 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: SLES 9 in an LPAR
.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Post, Mark K
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 1:31 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SLES 9 in an LPAR
I wondering how many devices are defined to the LPAR in the IOCDS. Any
idea?
Mark Post
: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 1:31 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: SLES 9 in an LPAR
I wondering how many devices are defined to the LPAR in the IOCDS. Any
idea?
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Scully
