of individual adapters. This minimizes outage caused by
adapter failure.
Best regards
Gabriel Frank
--- Mensaje Original --
De: Doug Griswold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Asunto: Re: VIPA in Intel platformh ??
Fecha: 03/02/2006
On Saturday, 02/04/2006 at 09:15 EST, Doug Griswold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sorry. I guess I didn't fully understand vipa. You could use interface
bonding to bond 2 interfaces into 1 to get redundancy.
The term VIPA varies in meaning according to the speaker and comes in
multiple flavors:
1.
thanks to everything.
I will teste it.
Gabriel
--- Mensaje Original --
De: Doug Griswold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Asunto: Re: VIPA in Intel platformh ??
Fecha: 04/02/2006 22:16:40
Mensaje:
Sorry. I guess I didn't fully
Hello, somebody knows the equivalent to VIPA in Intel platformh and GPL ?
Thank you.
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
Hello, somebody knows the equivalent to VIPA in Intel platformh and GPL
?
Thank you.
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or
visit
]
Para: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Asunto: Re: VIPA in Intel platformh ??
Fecha: 03/02/2006 20:45:21
Mensaje:
They are called Virtual Interfaces.
You configure it like any other interface except you reference it to the
base nic by placing a : x.
So to configure a Virtual
