:44 AM
Subject
Re: VM
test platforms
Please respond to
Linux on 39
2007 04:45
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: VM test platforms
I'll second this. In 20+ years of running VM, I can remember only two
cases where something worked differently 2nd level than it did 1st
level, and in at least one case, there was a reason for it.
Unless you really have to
I'll second this. In 20+ years of running VM, I can remember only two
cases where something worked differently 2nd level than it did 1st
level, and in at least one case, there was a reason for it.
Unless you really have to be 197.34% paranoid about such things (you're
launching missiles or runnin
M
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: VM test platforms
1. Use what you are familar with. If it was LPAR on the test box, you
may lean towards LPAR on your production box.
2. Many of the small to midrange shops never had LPAR. We always ran
VM in basic mode, hence we would run VM under VM for tes
1. Use what you are familar with. If it was LPAR on the test box, you
may lean towards LPAR on your production box.
2. Many of the small to midrange shops never had LPAR. We always ran
VM in basic mode, hence we would run VM under VM for testing. Now that
IBM forced everyone to LPAR, the smal
I'm going to go with one of my favorite answers here and say "it
depends". There are pros and cons for both approaches.
Some z/OS centric sites might feel more comfortable using the LPAR
approach,as that might fit in better with their over all system
management scheme.
Running z/VM as a 2nd
m C
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 8:03 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [LINUX-390] VM test platforms
Good morning List,
I have a question of general test and production architecture. We
currently have some production zLinux guests running under z/VM 5.1.
z/VM is installed as an LPAR on o
Tim C
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2007 10:03 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: VM test platforms
Good morning List,
I have a question of general test and production architecture. We
currently have some production zLinux guests running under z/VM 5.1.
z/VM is installed as an LPAR on our single
Moeur Tim C wrote:
Good morning List,
I have a question of general test and production architecture. We
currently have some production zLinux guests running under z/VM 5.1.
z/VM is installed as an LPAR on our single Z9 server. We had, until
recently, a second Z9 on which I was running a test
t: VM test platforms
Good morning List,
I have a question of general test and production architecture. We
currently have some production zLinux guests running under z/VM 5.1.
z/VM is installed as an LPAR on our single Z9 server. We had, until
recently, a second Z9 on which I was running a te
I would suggest the second LPAR approach, if anything for the separation
of function. Until you can get it defined, you can certainly run the
test VM second level.
Moeur Tim C wrote:
Good morning List,
I have a question of general test and production architecture. We
currently have some prod
Good morning List,
I have a question of general test and production architecture. We
currently have some production zLinux guests running under z/VM 5.1.
z/VM is installed as an LPAR on our single Z9 server. We had, until
recently, a second Z9 on which I was running a test VM which I could use
12 matches
Mail list logo
