On Monday, 10/14/2019 at 03:14 GMT, Joe Monk wrote:
> To further Alans point, this manual is loaded with references to "i390":
>
> http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg247748.pdf
IMO, that book should never have been published in that form, mashing
together the IBM internal use and
I used to have Ford Galaxy "XL500" I liked that name. The car not so much.
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 1:13 PM Alan Altmark
wrote:
> On Monday, 10/14/2019 at 04:57 GMT, Michael MacIsaac
>
> wrote:
> > Shoulda been 's390z'. IIRC it was decided less than a year before the
> > mainframe got rebranded
On Monday, 10/14/2019 at 04:57 GMT, Michael MacIsaac
wrote:
> Shoulda been 's390z'. IIRC it was decided less than a year before the
> mainframe got rebranded to 'z'.
Think of s390x and "s390 with extensions", a la 370/XA. The external
marketing term "z/Architecture" was very late. Based on
Shoulda been 's390z'. IIRC it was decided less than a year before the
mainframe got rebranded to 'z'.
-Mike
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 12:48 PM Rick Troth wrote:
> On 10/14/19 8:03 AM, James Tison wrote:
> > ...
> > 390x (z/Architecture) was introduced almost immediately after s390 came
> on
On 10/14/19 8:03 AM, James Tison wrote:
> ...
> 390x (z/Architecture) was introduced almost immediately after s390 came on
> board, and it seems to be the ID "with legs". In modern terms, i390 means
> nothing (unless someone would care to revive it), s390 means XA, s390x
> still means
Rob van der Heij wrote:
>But it’s true that those terms are not used outside Linux on System Z. >Even
though zArchitecture isn’t an appealing name. And we don’t hear much about
>i390 anymore
*ahem* "z/Architecture". IBM considers it to be software, interestingly enough,
so it gets the slash.
-)
> >
> > Jim Tison
> > z/TPF Systems Programmer
> > IBM Services
> >
> >
> >
> > From:Rob van der Heij
> > To:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> > Date:10/13/2019 11:50
> > Subject:[EXTERNAL] Re: Why Linux Developers
stems Programmer
> IBM Services
>
>
>
> From:Rob van der Heij
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Date: 10/13/2019 11:50
> Subject:[EXTERNAL] Re: Why Linux Developers Should Reconsider IBM
>Mainframes - Linux.com
> Sent by:Linux on 390 Por
On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 at 14:05, James Tison wrote:
> Now that I think about it, I don't think there was ever an i390 -- although
> there was an i370, which died a long time ago (based on the very first port
>
True, I was thinking of i370. My apologies. I still remember when I made a
typo when
11:50
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Re: Why Linux Developers Should Reconsider IBM
Mainframes - Linux.com
Sent by:Linux on 390 Port
But it’s true that those terms are not used outside Linux on System Z. Even
though zArchitecture isn’t an appealing name. And we don’t hear m
t; To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: [LINUX-390] Why Linux Developers Should Reconsider IBM Mainframes
> - Linux.com
>
> Interesting article.
> Cross posted to IBM-MAIN and LINUX-390.
> I don't think that 64bit was ever called 390x, was it?
>
>
>
>
> https://ww
Date: 10/13/19 09:30 (GMT-05:00)
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [LINUX-390] Why Linux Developers Should Reconsider IBM Mainframes -
Linux.com
Interesting article.
Cross posted to IBM-MAIN and LINUX-390.
I don't think that 64bit was ever called 390x, was it?
https://www.linux.com/articles
Interesting article.
Cross posted to IBM-MAIN and LINUX-390.
I don't think that 64bit was ever called 390x, was it?
https://www.linux.com/articles/why-linux-developers-should-reconsider-ibm-mainframes/
--
For LINUX-390
13 matches
Mail list logo
