>>> On 8/3/2011 at 02:08 PM, Tom Duerbusch wrote:
> And back to my original problem of the:
>
> MARTIAN SOURCE 192.168.195.255 FROM 192.168.193.176, ON DEV ETH0
> messages...
These messages are a result of packets coming in on an interface that your
routing tables say shouldn't be hitting that
>>> On 8/3/2011 at 01:55 PM, Tom Duerbusch wrote:
> Well, it didn't say it did anything:
>
> modprobe ipv6
> linux76:~ #
It never does, unless it can't find the module.
Mark Post
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / sign
Duerbusch
To:
LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu
Date:
08/03/2011 12:52 PM
Subject:
disabled IPV6, now down.
I've been getting the "MARTIAN SOURCE 192.168.195.255 FROM
192.168.193.176, ON DEV ETH0" on one of my test machines for two months.
So I decided to check it out and see if I can fix th
mv -vi /etc/modprobe.d/50-ipv6.conf /root/
mv -vi /etc/modprobe.d/50-ipv6.conf /root/
`/etc/modprobe.d/50-ipv6.conf' -> `/root/50-ipv6.conf'
linux76:~ # modprobe ipv6
modprobe ipv6
Well, it didn't say it did anything:
modprobe ipv6
linux76:~ #
Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting
>>> Scott Rohling 8/3/2011 12:04 PM >>>
Does a 'modprobe ipv6' have any effect?
Scott Rohling
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Tom Duerbusch
wrote:
> I've been getting the "MARTIAN SOURCE
>>> On 8/3/2011 at 12:47 PM, Tom Duerbusch wrote:
> No big deal in recreating this system. But it would be an interesting
> learning exercise in recovering from my failure.
mv -vi /etc/modprobe.d/50-ipv6.conf /root/
modprobe ipv6
modprobe qeth-l3
That might be enough. Or, you may need to:
r
Does a 'modprobe ipv6' have any effect?
Scott Rohling
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Tom Duerbusch
wrote:
> I've been getting the "MARTIAN SOURCE 192.168.195.255 FROM 192.168.193.176,
> ON DEV ETH0" on one of my test machines for two months.
>
> So I decided to check it out and see if I can fi
I've been getting the "MARTIAN SOURCE 192.168.195.255 FROM 192.168.193.176, ON
DEV ETH0" on one of my test machines for two months.
So I decided to check it out and see if I can fix the problem.
Per a Google search, I found a suggestion which looked reasonable:
More details would be needed.
if
