I thank you for doing this! Long ago and far away I did report a problem with
SWAPGEN. I took this up with IBM, since they were providing our Linux (Red Hat)
support and since they used SWAPGEN in their RedBook. Eventually, IBM
determined that the problem was not in SWAPGEN but in systemd. They
.com
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of David
Boyes
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2018 11:29
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: question on SWAPGEN preferences
On 12/27/18, 11:16 AM, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Rob van
On 12/27/18, 11:16 AM, "Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Rob van der Heij"
wrote:
> I don’t see how specifying the size should make a difference, apart from
> the last odd blocks when an arbitrary size does not make a full number of
> cylinders.
Apparently there are still a fair number of people
O’br...@bankofamerica.com
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of David
Boyes
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2018 06:38
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: question on SWAPGEN preferences
I'm trying to tackle some of the backlogged nits wit
sizes or future changes in swap disk formats.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sam
> (217) 862-9227 (office)
> (602) 327-2134 (cell)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of David Boyes
> Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2018 7:38 AM
> To: LINUX-390@VM.MA
I don’t see how specifying the size should make a difference, apart from
the last odd blocks when an arbitrary size does not make a full number of
cylinders.
If you’re talking VDISK then it seems irrelevant since there’s just a doze
blocks to be written at any size.
With 3390 we can’t really avoid
2134 (cell)
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port On Behalf Of David Boyes
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2018 7:38 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: question on SWAPGEN preferences
I'm trying to tackle some of the backlogged nits with SWAPGEN, and wanted to
get opinions on a couple of
I'm trying to tackle some of the backlogged nits with SWAPGEN, and wanted to
get opinions on a couple of changes.
1. Right now, the size of the swap disk is specified in # of blocks. Would
it be valuable to be able to specify this in megabytes/gigabytes and let
SWAPGEN worry about the geom
