John,
I've never chaired for a session, but would be willing to do so for the
following:
22114 What's New in VM:Secure Mon 2018-03-12, 11:15:00 Brian Jagos
22106 How to Backup Your Guests in an SSI Using VM:Backup Fri 2018-03-16,
11:15:00 Brian Jagos
Rick
-Original Message-
From:
Yes, It's working.
Thanks,
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Bfishing
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 12:02 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: TEST
Hopefully you get this Rick.
On May 9, 2016 11:46 AM, "Beard,
Enviado do Yahoo Mail no Android
Em 12:44 Seg, 9 de Mai de PM, Beard, Rick<rick.be...@atos.net> escreveu:
Could I get someone to reply to this email as I noticed I haven't been getting
any emails lately from the Linux list server group?
I've subscribed again to see if this fixes the
Could I get someone to reply to this email as I noticed I haven't been getting
any emails lately from the Linux list server group?
I've subscribed again to see if this fixes the issue.
Thanks,
Rick Beard
Infrastructure Management Senior Analyst
ITO Global Service Operations & Engineering
I would like to know if anyone has any preferences on using either CA:VMSECURE
or CA:ACF2 for securing z/VM systems?
Is one more secure than the other?
Is one easier to use and configure over the other?
Thanks,
Rick Beard
Infrastructure Management Senior Analyst
ITO Global Service Operations &
Does anyone know if you can have both a secure TN3270 port and a non-secure
TN3270 port on a z/VM system? I've setup a secure TN3270 port, but once I did
that it stops the listening of port 23. I would like to have both for a while
if that is possible.
Thanks,
Rick Beard
Infrastructure
Barton,
I would be interested in seeing MineCraft running on z/VM.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Barton
Robinson
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 3:14 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: websites down - Linuxvm.org,
On Jul 21, 2015, at 10:49 AM, Beard, Rick (Atos)
rick.be...@xerox.commailto:rick.be...@xerox.com wrote:
Well, I was already at 1GB and I tried 2GB, but still have the same issue. I
have an open issue with Red Hat, so will see what they come up with.
Rick
-Original Message
On Jul 22, 2015, at 8:30 AM, Beard, Rick (Atos) rick.be...@xerox.com wrote:
Filipe,
I'm using ECKD DASD and it was formatted using CA's VMDIRECT software when it
allocated it to the Linux image.
Here is my PARM file.
ro ramdisk_size=4 cio_ignore=all,!condev
ip
22, 2015, at 8:30 AM, Beard, Rick (Atos) rick.be...@xerox.com wrote:
Filipe,
I'm using ECKD DASD and it was formatted using CA's VMDIRECT software when it
allocated it to the Linux image.
Here is my PARM file.
ro ramdisk_size=4 cio_ignore=all,!condev
ip
11:16 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Linux 7.1 on z/VM 6.3
Rick,
Please make sure that the VM have at least 1GB of RAM. (I had similar problems
when trying to install using less than one GB of RAM)
Kind Regards,
Filipe Miranda
On Jul 21, 2015, at 7:35 AM, Beard, Rick (Atos
%20v2.pdf
http://people.redhat.com/fmiranda/systemz/slide_decks/Special%20Events/IBM%20T3%20Bobligen%20Germany%202015%20v2.pdf
Kind Regards,
Filipe Miranda
fmira...@redhat.com
On Jul 17, 2015, at 7:17 AM, Grzegorz Powiedziuk gpowiedz...@gmail.com
wrote:
2015-07-17 9:55 GMT-04:00 Beard
It's got plenty of memory and CPU. I have built a new z/VM 6.3 SSI system and
only have one guest running in it so far on Red Hat Linux version 6.5. I
wanted to see about running version 7.1, but it appears Red Hat must have made
some changes on how to install it as my PARM file, that I have
wget
%end
Gregory Powiedziuk
2015-07-17 8:38 GMT-04:00 Beard, Rick (Atos) rick.be...@xerox.com:
It's got plenty of memory and CPU. I have built a new z/VM 6.3 SSI
system and only have one guest running in it so far on Red Hat Linux version
6.5.
I wanted to see about running version 7.1
Anyone try to install Linux version 7.1 on z/VM 6.3 yet? I tried too, but when
I punch the reader to start the install I get the following ugly messages:
Ý 122.518597¨ INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU { 1
Ý 149.846203¨ INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:}
Ý 149.846205¨
Since it's part of the kernel now, I'm assuming there is a way to secure it to
keep everyone from having access to issue VMCP commands?
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Christian
Borntraeger
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014
16 matches
Mail list logo
