Re: backlight mystery

2007-03-05 Thread Zhao Forrest
On 3/6/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 02:43:12 -0500 Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:30:37PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > I always get stuff like this coming out when I boot my x86_64 machine: > > > > asus_acpi: Unkno

Re: backlight mystery

2007-03-05 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 02:43:12 -0500 Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:30:37PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > I always get stuff like this coming out when I boot my x86_64 machine: > > > > asus_acpi: Unknown symbol backlight_device_unregister > > asus_acpi

Re: backlight mystery

2007-03-05 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:30:37PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > I always get stuff like this coming out when I boot my x86_64 machine: > > asus_acpi: Unknown symbol backlight_device_unregister > asus_acpi: Unknown symbol backlight_device_register > ibm_acpi: Unknown symbol backlight_devi

backlight mystery

2007-03-05 Thread Andrew Morton
I always get stuff like this coming out when I boot my x86_64 machine: asus_acpi: Unknown symbol backlight_device_unregister asus_acpi: Unknown symbol backlight_device_register ibm_acpi: Unknown symbol backlight_device_unregister ibm_acpi: Unknown symbol backlight_device_register toshiba_acpi: Un

Re: acpi-fan-after-suspend-to-mem-fix.patch

2007-03-05 Thread Tommi Kyntola
Negative, Konstantin explained the reasons why it's intentionally been set to _D0. "Actually, I've meant the situation where the system could go down on thermal (possibly h/w) shutdown during suspend. If the fans stay on during suspend, where thermal control is possibly not working already, ther

Re: Any difference between disabling ACPI in BIOS and acpi=off

2007-03-05 Thread Len Brown
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 00:56, Zhao Forrest wrote: > Hi, > > For RHEL4-U4-64bit, we can boot up kernel with ACPI enabled in BIOS > whether we add the kernel parameter "acpi=off" or not; however kernel > can't boot with ACPI disabled in BIOS whether we add kernel parameter > "acpi=off" or not. >

Any difference between disabling ACPI in BIOS and acpi=off

2007-03-05 Thread Zhao Forrest
Hi, For RHEL4-U4-64bit, we can boot up kernel with ACPI enabled in BIOS whether we add the kernel parameter "acpi=off" or not; however kernel can't boot with ACPI disabled in BIOS whether we add kernel parameter "acpi=off" or not. My question is, is there any difference between disabling ACPI i

Re: 2.6.21-rc1: known regressions (v2) (part 1)

2007-03-05 Thread Jeff Chua
On 3/5/07, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have the same problem on my IBM X60s on rc1 and rc2. Can't resume > from RAM, can't suspend to disk. It is possible to revert all the > changes to ACPI and test it? This is with CONFIG_KVM=n? Yes. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

acpi-fan-after-suspend-to-mem-fix.patch

2007-03-05 Thread Andrew Morton
Should I merge this into mainline?? From: Tommi Kyntola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> acpi_fan_suspend should probably set state to ACPI_D3, rather than ACPI_D0. With this change the fan works after S3 suspend atleast on HP nw8000 laptop, for which the suspended fan has been broken since sword-and-stone

Fixing DSDT table for correct LID behavior

2007-03-05 Thread Renato Alves
Hi guys. This is my first message to the mailing list. I'm still new to the ACPI and DSDT mambo jumbo and not a programmer, but anyway... I tried to debug the dsdt of my laptop (Acer Aspire 1694 LMi) to solve some of the typical problems (no BAT info, boot hangs...). So far, by using a mixture of

Re: [lm-sensors] Could the k8temp driver be interfering with ACPI?

2007-03-05 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > Why would we end up with an overestimation if we check the I/O ports at > > > boot time? Do you have concrete cases in mind? > > > > ACPI will often describe large operation regions, but won't necessarily > > touch all of them. Effectively, every codepath would have to be walked > > t

Re: 2.6.19: ACPI reports AC not present after resume from STD

2007-03-05 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
[changed Cc list] On Sunday, 25 February 2007 18:14, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > On Воскресенье 25 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Sunday, 25 February 2007 11:37, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > > > On Воскресенье 25 февраля 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Sunday, 25 February 2007

Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.21 - part II (resend)

2007-03-05 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > commit 4465857d5f99079bae00621626adf74ed8256296 > Author: Mattia Dongili <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat Jan 13 23:04:39 2007 +0100 > > sony_acpi: Add lanpower and audiopower controls > > audiopower works well on my SZ72B so it's not marked has "debug" while > lanpower >

Re: [lm-sensors] Could the k8temp driver be interfering with ACPI?

2007-03-05 Thread David Hubbard
Hi Jean, Rudolf, 1* It requires that we modify each driver individually. It's quite a shame that we have to update drivers all around the kernel tree with specific code to workaround a problem which is originally located in a single place (the ACPI subsystem.) That being said this isn't a blocke

Re: [lm-sensors] Could the k8temp driver be interfering with ACPI?

2007-03-05 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Rudolf, On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 18:29:12 +0100, Rudolf Marek wrote: > I produced some code which I proposed in mail above. The patch is not for > review > it is just a PoC to better show what I'm trying to do. It is a test case for > my > motherboard which has W83627EHF chip and ACPI thermal meth

Re: Fan speeds on HP nc6400 and nc8430

2007-03-05 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On 3/4/07, emisca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At what kernel are targeted these patches? I have an nx7400, and the same psmouse problems I would like to test them.. Please try 2.6.21-rc2 - the patches are included there. -- Dmitry - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: [lm-sensors] Could the k8temp driver be interfering with ACPI?

2007-03-05 Thread Bodo Eggert
David Hubbard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For I/O and memory that ACPI accesses and has not reserved, the AML > interpreter could allocate at run-time. > > I'm not sure how to implement exactly. For example, it would be bad to > have a /proc/ioports that had a lot of single ports allocated, for

Missing C-States since 2.6.19

2007-03-05 Thread Eduard Giménez Cerdà
Hi, As I explained on a previous mail [1], upgrading the BIOS I got the system using the C1 and C2 states when idle. But with newer kernels (2.6.19, 2.6.20 and 2.6.20.1) the system stopped using these states. I've found that pr->power.states[2].valid is true on the 2.6.18 branch, but fals

Re: [4/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-05 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 02:50 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Subject: LCD is dimmed (ibm-acpi related) > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/25/206 > Submitter : Jiri Kosina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Caused-By : Richard Purdie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > commit 994efacdf9a087b52f71e620b58

RE: acpid on gentoo

2007-03-05 Thread Nigel Nigel
Thanks for replying, answers inline : > Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 13:09:36 -0800 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: acpid on gentoo > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Nigel: > Have you started the acpid daemon? Yes. # ps -ef | grep [a]cpi root 8 5 0 09:2

Re: [4/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions

2007-03-05 Thread Antonino A. Daplas
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 02:50 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.21-rc2 compared to 2.6.20 > that are not yet fixed in Linus' tree. > > If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one > of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsyste