Hi, all
According to the document of 253369(intel), the ratio is
undefined in MSR_FBC_REGSITER_ID. The following calculation is
inappropriate.
if (c->x86_model < 2)
mult = msr_lo >> 27;
There are two ways to fix this problem.
a. use the following patch. the ratio is obtained from m
A couple of minor changes to the fujitsu laptop acpi driver.
1. use kzalloc.
2. add dmi aliases to get the driver to autoload.
note: use both spellings since different fujtisu laptop's seem to
capitialize
differently.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- a/drivers/mi
On Thursday 25 October 2007 4:55:07 pm Thomas Renninger wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 09:06 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > Isn't the real problem that we have a bunch of drivers that use some of
> > the same resources, and if ACPI reserved all the right resources, all
> > those drivers would brea
Thomas Renninger wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 19:00 +0100, Andrew wrote:
Hi,
This is probably nothing since there seems to be no ill effects
but I thought someone should know because...well it bothers me.
Heres a diff of the kernel boot log between 2.6.23 and 2.6.24:
scsi4 : pata_amd
scsi5
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 09:06 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 October 2007 08:31:59 am Thomas Renninger wrote:
> > In ACPI, AML can define accesses to IO ports and System Memory by
> > Operation Regions. Those are not registered as done by PNPACPI using
> > resource templates (and _CRS/
This is one of the most imortant issues with ACPI in Linux,
and I too thank you, Thomas and Jean, for your hard work
seeking the right solution.
1, 2 and 3 of 5 applied to acpi-test.
thanks,
-Len
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 10:31, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it seems Len's test tree and
On Thursday, 25 October 2007 22:29, Len Brown wrote:
> On Thursday 25 October 2007 15:24, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> > Len Brown wrote:
>
> > > and going away), and the DSDT databse -- which I believe
> > > is also somewhat of a historical artifact.
>
> > DSDT database or better acpidump.out da
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 16:29 -0400, Len Brown wrote:
> On Thursday 25 October 2007 15:24, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> > Len Brown wrote:
>
> > > and going away), and the DSDT databse -- which I believe
> > > is also somewhat of a historical artifact.
>
> > DSDT database or better acpidump.out da
Applied.
thanks,
-len
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 13:18, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > After commit f1d4661abe05d0a2c014166042d15ed8b69ae8f2 this was dead
> > code.
> >
> > Spotted by the Coverity checker.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Acked. T
Applied.
thanks,
-Len
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 13:30, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 09:15:18PM +0400, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> >> Adrian,
> >>
> >> commit 30c08574da0ead1a47797ce028218ce5b2de61c7 can not introduce
> >> use-after-free.
> >>
>
On Thursday 25 October 2007 15:24, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> Len Brown wrote:
> > and going away), and the DSDT databse -- which I believe
> > is also somewhat of a historical artifact.
> DSDT database or better acpidump.out database might be very useful,
> if could be searched for particular
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:51:35 +0200
Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:57:23 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:31:59 +0200 Thomas Renninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > it seems Len's test tree and Linus tree diverged a bit, at least
Len Brown wrote:
> and going away), and the DSDT databse -- which I believe
> is also somewhat of a historical artifact.
DSDT database or better acpidump.out database might be very useful,
if could be searched for particular feature -- absence of EC, use of SBS, etc.
Alex.
-
To unsubscribe from th
The home page for the Linux/ACPI project is moving here:
http://www.lesswatts.org/projects/acpi/
(Thank you to the lesswatts project for supplying webmaster
and hosting resources for us:-)
I conjured up most of the content -- so please send
any feedback on content to me.
Don't sweat the format
Hi Mark,
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 08:04:38 -0400, Mark M. Hoffman wrote:
> Hi Thomas:
>
> I recently told someone in private that ACPI vs. hwmon conflicts are the
> biggest open problems for the hwmon subsystem. Thank you (and Jean) for
> doing this.
>
> * Thomas Renninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 08:31:59 am Thomas Renninger wrote:
> In ACPI, AML can define accesses to IO ports and System Memory by
> Operation Regions. Those are not registered as done by PNPACPI using
> resource templates (and _CRS/_SRS methods).
> The IO ports and System Memory regions may get
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 15:48 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:53:47 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:33:07 +0200 Thomas Renninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > From: Thomas Renninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: linux-acpi
> > >
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:57:23 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:31:59 +0200 Thomas Renninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > it seems Len's test tree and Linus tree diverged a bit, at least with
> > this patch set things do not apply cleanly.
> >
> > Therefore I post these for
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:53:47 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:33:07 +0200 Thomas Renninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From: Thomas Renninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: linux-acpi
> > Cc: linux-kernel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Len Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andrew
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> After all I think all this problems may be some who ACPI related
>> but the question is why they get triggered by Suspend/Hibernation.
>
> They certainly are ACPI-related, because the only difference between level 4
> and level 3 suspend testing is that some global
Hi Thomas:
I recently told someone in private that ACPI vs. hwmon conflicts are the
biggest open problems for the hwmon subsystem. Thank you (and Jean) for
doing this.
* Thomas Renninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-24 16:31:59 +0200]:
> Hi,
>
> it seems Len's test tree and Linus tree diverged
On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 19:00 +0100, Andrew wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is probably nothing since there seems to be no ill effects
> but I thought someone should know because...well it bothers me.
>
> Heres a diff of the kernel boot log between 2.6.23 and 2.6.24:
>
> scsi4 : pata_amd
> scsi5 : pata_am
On 25/10/2007, Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ash Milsted wrote:
> > On 25/10/2007, Ash Milsted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 24/10/2007, Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Ash Milsted wrote:
> On 24/10/2007, Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
23 matches
Mail list logo
