On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:19:24 +0200 Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi events from keypresses
such as Fn-F4 and lid open/close, prints them in /var/log/acpid
and reacts accordingly (my acpi scripts suspend on lid close and Fn-F4).
You mean
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 00:34:06 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10071
Summary: kernel hang in inet_init
Product: Networking
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.25 rc2 latest git
Platform: All
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:48:12 +0200 Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Andrew Morton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:36:54 +0200 Michael S. Tsirkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hmm, mystery partly solved... as you guessed
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 21:29:24 + Daniel J Blueman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My 2.2GHz [1] Thinkpad T61 is unable to get past 1.2GHz, seemingly
because of the _PPC ACPI objects [2].
Given that the _PPC object is different for both cores, is this more
of a BIOS bug or an ACPI interpreter
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:47:08 + Paul Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, this was working in 2.6.23, but is not in any later kernel. Previously
reported, but I guess that the previous report was ignored due to the kernel
being tainted.
Not really. A lot of acpi-related bug reports get
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:21:33 +0100 Thomas Petazzoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:21:29 -0800,
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] a __crit :
ug, sorry, if I'd realised it was like this I'd have said don't
bother. Apart from the obvious problem, this means that people
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 16:55:02 +0100 Thomas Petazzoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le Mon, 18 Feb 2008 04:13:40 -0800,
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] a __crit :
Option 3 wold be to add more #ifdef CONFIG_DMI lines around the
place. How ugly would that get?
Like the attached patch. #ifdef
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:15:36 +0100 Thomas Petazzoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Le Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:44:10 -0800,
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] a __crit :
Bustage in x86-configurable-dmi-scanning-code.patch. Previously,
DMI=y was just hardwired. Now, it becomes selectable
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 00:54:08 + (GMT) Chris Rankin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Try this again, except this time I'll force the attachment as inline text!]
Hi,
I have managed to boot 2.6.24.1 on this machine, with the NMI watchdog
enabled, by using the
acpi=noirq option. (There does
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 00:54:08 + (GMT) Chris Rankin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Try this again, except this time I'll force the attachment as inline text!]
Hi,
I have managed to boot 2.6.24.1 on this machine, with the NMI watchdog
enabled, by using the
acpi=noirq option. (There does
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:16:03 -0800 Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:25:22 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc2/2.6.25-rc2-mm1/
ACPI is enabled, but DMI=n.
linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/drivers/acpi
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:51:15 -0800 (PST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
Summary: 2.6.25-rc1 regression - IBM ACPI backlight controlls do
not work
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion:
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c: In function 'acpi_save_state_mem':
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c:55: warning: passing argument 1 of
'native_store_gdt' from incompatible pointer type
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c:71: warning: assignment makes integer from pointer
without a cast
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:33:10 +0530
Thomas, Sujith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For time being I am attaching the patch and in the meanwhile
I'll figure out
a way to fix the wordwrap issues. This was what Len Brown also had
recommended.
This patch has no changelog. Please include the full
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:10:00 -0800
Mike Travis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:37:40 -0800
Mike Travis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Change cpufreq tables from arrays to per_cpu variables in
drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
Based on linux-2.6.git
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:00:11 -0800 (PST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9957
Summary: Battery gives me now two batterys, but only one is
present
yeah, I'm seeing this on the t61p as well, but have thus far ignored it
amongst
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:27:44 +0530
Thomas, Sujith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patch is fairly seriously wordwrapped.
Should be fixed now.
No, even after I fixed all the wordwrapping I saw a large amount
of fuzz and several rejects when trying to apply the patch.
There's a reason why Len
(Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the bugzilla web interface)
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:02:31 -0800 (PST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9944
Summary: suspend to ram doesn't work anymore on Thinkpad T61 with
On Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:37:40 -0800
Mike Travis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Change cpufreq tables from arrays to per_cpu variables in
drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c
Based on linux-2.6.git + x86.git
I fixed a bunch of rejects in [PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: change cpu freq tables
to per_cpu variables
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 22:45:09 +0100 Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Symptom is that the system shuts down normally and completely, it just does
not power off.
I've been struggling with an identically-manifesting regression on one of
my test machines for a week. It's due to softlockup
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:57:06 +0530
Thomas, Sujith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Thomas Sujith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Added sanity checks for interface functions in thermal with
other modules such as fan, processor, video etc..
Signed-off-by: Thomas Sujith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 13:25:36 +0100
Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 23:40:02 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:32:59 +0200 Thomas Renninger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Provide acpi_check_{mem_}region.
Drivers can additionally
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 19:58:10 + (GMT)
Chris Rankin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It isn't clear (to me) where in this mess we disabled interrupts around the
set_cpus_allowed(). Chris, if this is repeatable it would be helpful to
set
]
Cc: Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/hwmon/dme1737.c|5 +
drivers/hwmon/f71805f.c|5 +
drivers/hwmon/f71882fg.c |5 +
drivers/hwmon/it87.c |5 +
drivers/hwmon/pc87360.c|6 ++
drivers
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 13:22:26 -0500 Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 05 February 2008 18:32, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 23:36:42 + (GMT)
Chris Rankin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a 1 GHz Coppermine PC with 512 MB RAM, and it is failing to boot
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008 16:05:41 +0100 (CET)
Guennadi Liakhovetski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Don't know if this should be considered a bug-report, or just another ACPI
bug on my system. In any case, if the CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR is enabled, on
first boot after a power off the system is slow.
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 01:25:50 + Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 10:00:45PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
- Create a new /sys node with a new name which has the new semantics.
The semantics are the same as they always have been - values between 0
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:44:48 -0500 Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 25 December 2007 21:03, Matthew Garrett wrote:
The sysfs backlight class provides no mechanism for querying the
acceptable brightness for a backlight. The ACPI spec states that values
are only valid if they
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 16:03:18 -0700 Bjorn Helgaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+static void quirk_supermicro_h8dce_system(struct pnp_dev *dev)
hm. If you trace back through the callchain here is seems that large
amounts of the pnp code could be made __init/__initdata. The two callers
of
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:16:22 +0530 Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-01-17 02:35:14]:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.24-rc8/2.6.24-rc8-mm1/
- selinux is busted on one of my two selinux-enabled test
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:22:19 -0800 Pallipadi, Venkatesh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The problem is
modprobe:2584 conflicting cache attribute 5000-50001000
uncached-default
Some address range here is being mapped with conflicting types.
Somewhere the range was mapped with default
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:39:26 -0800
Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/net/sky2.c b/drivers/net/sky2.c
index c27c7d6..4f41a94 100644
--- a/drivers/net/sky2.c
+++ b/drivers/net/sky2.c
@@ -2791,6 +2791,9 @@ static void sky2_reset(struct sky2_hw *hw)
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:08:38 +0100 supersud501 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
supersud501 wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Since it seems to be 100% reproducible, it would be very helpful if
you could
use git-bisect to identify the offending commit.
allright, bisect found
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 21:27:40 +0100 supersud501 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
So simply reverting this:
commit ac93a3946b676025fa55356180e8321639744b31
Author: Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon Nov 5 15:52:08 2007 -0800
sky2: enable PCI
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:38:25 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9731
Summary: 2.6.24-rc7: Deadlock when any ACPI eject sys node
written
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:46:13 -0800
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The first patch in the series introduces such a mechanism. The remaining
three
patches modify the MSR, x86-64 MCE and cpuid drivers in accordance with the
above approach.
These patches are a preresuisite
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 00:32:44 +0100
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some device drivers register CPU hotplug notifiers and use them to destroy
device objects when removing the corresponding CPUs and to create these
objects
when adding the CPUs back.
Unfortunately, this is not the
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:11:52 -0500 (EST) Alan Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 04:49:04PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
err, no. pm-introduce-destroy_suspended_device.patch demolishes
pm-acquire-device-locks-on-suspend-rev-3
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:53:38 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mark Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fix /proc/acpi/alarm to not overwrite the RTC century field when setting a
wake alarm. The alarm hardware doesn't have a century field, and we really
should not be fiddling with the RTC century
Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c |4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 16:06:20 -0800 Pallipadi, Venkatesh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Mark Lord [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 3:42 PM
To: Arjan van de Ven
Cc: Pallipadi, Venkatesh; Andrew Morton; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL
Another regression.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 16:07:30 -0800 (PST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bugme-new] [Bug 9663] New: in 2.6.24-rc6 function keys on my notebook
doesn`t work
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9663
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 15:08:37 -0200 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
When I fire up the latest Linus tree on my thinkpad t61p I get:
thinkpad_acpi: ThinkPad ACPI Extras v0.17
thinkpad_acpi: http://ibm-acpi.sf.net
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 07:34:06 + Matthew Garrett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 12:00:57AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
and /sys/class/backlight/thinkpad_screen/brightness is no longer present, so
my `brightness' script no longer works. That, my friends, is a regression
When I fire up the latest Linus tree on my thinkpad t61p I get:
thinkpad_acpi: ThinkPad ACPI Extras v0.17
thinkpad_acpi: http://ibm-acpi.sf.net/
thinkpad_acpi: ThinkPad BIOS 7LET44WW (1.14 ), EC 7KHT22WW-1.06
thinkpad_acpi: Lenovo ThinkPad T61p
thinkpad_acpi: radio switch found; radios are
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 13:00:19 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9627
Looks like another regression to track, please.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-acpi in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 01:24:32 +0100
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday, 14 of December 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ia64 allmodconfig:
kernel/power/main.c:493: error: `pm_test_attr' undeclared here (not in a
function
/acpi/video.c.
list_add_tail(data-entry, video-video_device_list);
went bad..
From: Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We missed one:
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [0001] code: modprobe/3107
caller is die+0x5d/0x1db
Pid: 3107, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.24
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 01:26:11 -0500 Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please pull from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git release
This will update the files shown below.
thanks!
-Len
ps. individual patches are available on
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:25:57 -0700 Bjorn Helgaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew, can you add this before
pnp-request-ioport-and-iomem-resources-used-by-active-devices.patch?
...
PNP: do not stop/start devices in suspend/resume path
I did, but I also temporarily dropped
(switching to email - please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface)
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:18:05 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9555
Summary: Suspend to RAM horks keyboard autorepeat, system bell,
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 01:57:51 -0800 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now let me see what caused the keystrokes-no-longer-trigger-resume-from-RAM
regression.
OK, I must have dreamed this - 2.6.23 requires a power-button tap to
come back from suspend-to-RAM as well.
-
To unsubscribe from
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 05:55:20 -0800 (PST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9533
Another box-killing regression to track, please. Either ATA or ACPI.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-acpi in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:52:43 -0800
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 05:55:20 -0800 (PST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9533
Another box-killing regression to track, please. Either ATA or ACPI.
er, no, not box-killing
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:06:14 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Monday, 10 of December 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 02:04:13 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Monday, 10 of December 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 09 Dec
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:21:56 -0800 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However reverting 9cd9a0058dd35268b24fa16795a92c800f4086d4 does not fix the
machine-reboots-after-resume-from-disk regression.
It gets to here:
Attempting manual resume
swsusp: Marking nosave pages
2.6.24-rc4 on a Lenovo t61p, using FC8 config.
echo mem /sys/power/state while running X.
It appears to suspend OK but then it instantly resumes and runs
OK except the display is blank.
A copy of /proc/acpi/dsdt is at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dsdt.t61p
config:
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 13:40:07 +0100 Tomas Carnecky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
2.6.24-rc4 on a Lenovo t61p, using FC8 config.
echo mem /sys/power/state while running X.
It appears to suspend OK but then it instantly resumes and runs
OK except the display is blank
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 02:04:13 +0100 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Monday, 10 of December 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 13:40:07 +0100 Tomas Carnecky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
2.6.24-rc4 on a Lenovo t61p, using FC8 config
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 11:12:57 +0100 Andreas Mohr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 01:36:31AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
Subject : PATA scan: ACPI Exception AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT... is
beyond end of object
Submitter : Hans de Bruin [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 17:53:47 -0500
Parag Warudkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Got this on today's git (2.6.24-rc4) while compiling stuff - Looks
like it is related to CpuIdle stuff.
I chose CONFIG_CPU_IDLE for the first time so I don't know when this
was introduced.
This is on x86_32, SMP.
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 22:14:08 -0500 Mark Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
latency. If your app cant take any latency, you should set those... and
the side effect is that the kernel will not do long-latency C-states or
P-state transitions..
..
I don't mind the cpufreq changing (actually, I
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:06:55 -0800
Pallipadi, Venkatesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please dont go off-list like this. I put Mark's original mailing list cc's
back.
I will have to Nack this. The reason max_cstate was initentionally
removed due to couple of reasons:
It broke userspace without
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:39:43 -0500
Rik van Riel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:18:39 -0800
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
..MP-BIOS bug: 8254 timer not connected to IO-APIC
Kernel panic - not syncing: IO-APIC + timer doesn't work! Try using the
'noapic
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:08:33 +0100
Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/26/2007 09:45 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:39:43 -0500
Rik van Riel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:18:39 -0800
Andrew Morton
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:09:51 +0300
Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
cat
/sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/device:00/PNP0A08:00/device:19/PNP0C0A:00/power_
supply/BAT1/status
This leads to a
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:52:26 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:41:23 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Kernel panic's across different architectures like powerpc, x86_64,
powerpc complains
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:41:23 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Kernel panic's across different architectures like powerpc, x86_64,
powerpc complains about IO-APICs??
Dentry cache hash table entries: 8388608 (order: 14, 67108864 bytes)
Inode-cache hash table
(switched to email. Please reply via emailed reply-to-all, not via the
bugzilla web interface).
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:56:13 -0800 (PST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9398
Summary: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
Product:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 11:35:18 +0300 Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I can not contact with Len for several days, while the oops on battery
seems quite important.
It also seem to behave well in -mm tree (as part of Len's acpi-test).
Will you send this patch to Linus without
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 23:12:18 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9334
Summary: Kernel 2.6.22 computer turn off
Product: Other
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion: 2.6.22
Platform: All
OS/Version:
On Fri, 09 Nov 2007 12:36:43 +0300 Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
A On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:35:23 +0300 Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
[remove_cycle_at_battery_removal.patch text/x-patch (1.7KB)]
ACPI: Battery: remove cycle from battery
(cc's added)
On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 09:47:02 +0100 SANGOI DINO LEONARDO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
My laptop (an HP nx6125) doesn't boot with kernels 2.6.24-rc1 and
2.6.24.rc2.
It works fine with 2.6.23 and older.
I seen this bug first while running fedora rawhide, so you can find
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 14:20:56 +0100
Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two cleanups to linux/acpi.h:
* Stop defining acpi_mp_config, it isn't used anywhere.
* Discard nested #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI, they are useless and
error-prone.
It's not a good time to be doing not-strictly-needed cleanup
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:02:56 -0500 Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:49:58AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:43:59 +0100 Roberto Oppedisano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote, On 11/07/2007 09:13 PM:
On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:19:05 -0500 Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:13:41AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:02:56 -0500 Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:49:58AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 08 Nov
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:49:33 -0500 Mark Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:19:05 -0500 Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:13:41AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 13:02:56 -0500 Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED
A On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:35:23 +0300 Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[remove_cycle_at_battery_removal.patch text/x-patch (1.7KB)]
ACPI: Battery: remove cycle from battery removal.
From: Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
get_property() should not call battery_update() on
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 13:35:00 -0800 (PST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9320
Summary: PATA scan: ACPI Exception AE_AML_PACKAGE_LIMIT... is
beyond end of object
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
this patch introduces a compile error:
drivers/acpi/osl.c:1203: error: conflicting types for 'acpi_os_validate_address'
include/acpi/acpiosxf.h:243: error: previous declaration of
'acpi_os_validate_address' was here
which the next patch fixes. This breaks git-bisection and will cause great
On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:20:29 -0700 Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[PATCH] x86: check boundary in count/setup_resource called by
get_current_resources
need to check info-res_num less than PCI_BUS_NUM_RESOURCES, so
info-bus-resource[info-res_num] = res will not beyond of bus resource
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:33:07 +0200 Thomas Renninger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Thomas Renninger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: linux-acpi linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel [EMAIL PROTECTED], Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andrew
Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:31:59 +0200 Thomas Renninger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it seems Len's test tree and Linus tree diverged a bit, at least with
this patch set things do not apply cleanly.
Therefore I post these for discussion whether and in which kernel tree
they should end up before
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 04:39:30 +0200 Maxim Levitsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A while ago I asked on LKML about the problem of loosing all wake device
capabilities, after a suspend to disk
(eg: I can't wake the system from keyboard if I suspend to disk and then to
ram)
I was provided with
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 02:37:35 -0700 (PDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9155
Summary: No fan control with ATI Radeon display support on HP
nx6125.
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion:
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007 23:10:47 -0400 Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please pull from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git release
...
drivers/acpi/battery.c | 1038 +
Does this introduce the problem which Zan Lynx reported in
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:39:14 -0600 Bjorn Helgaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- w.orig/include/linux/pnp.h2007-09-13 16:25:48.0 -0600
+++ w/include/linux/pnp.h 2007-09-13 16:26:04.0 -0600
@@ -8,6 +8,10 @@
#ifdef __KERNEL__
+#ifdef CONFIG_PNP_DEBUG
+#define
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:51:09 +0200 Damien Wyart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
After testing rc8, I noticed that I couldn't power off the computer
directly, it only got halted and I had to press the power button
manually. Just before displaying System halted, the following message
is
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:45:15 +0400 Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[fix-ACPI_SLEEP_states.patch text/x-patch (2.0KB)]
ACPI: suspend: fix ACPI_SLEEP states
From: Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:28:30 -0400 Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 23 September 2007 20:57, Andrew Morton wrote:
Wha? Seems that the cpuidle patches all got dropped, but the x86_64
dynticks patches were fairly heavily dependent upon them. (iow: I'm
screwed).
I
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:59:04 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 September 2007 13:54, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 September 2007 06:40, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:12:13 -0700 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 23:42:25 +0200
From: Michael Gerdau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 and acpi
Hi,
while trying to compile 2.6.23-rc6-mm1 I came across the following
build error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/linux-2.6.23-rc6-mm1
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:21:41 -0400 Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 18 September 2007 00:12, Andrew Morton wrote:
It suspends OK, then during resume it gets partway through it, then
everything
just stops.
Hmmm, i thought your vaio resume problems were in linus' tree
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 15:58:18 -0400
Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 18 September 2007 13:07, Andrew Morton wrote:
This breakage in git-acpi is new, I think. Four or five days ago, git-acpi
_fixed_ suspend/resume on Linus's tree. Now it breaks it.
But I don't think
It suspends OK, then during resume it gets partway through it, then everything
just stops.
Would prefer not to have to bisect this one - I've done enough bisecting this
week to last a lifetime, and bisecting git-acpi is painful due to build bustage
at various points (cpuidle).
-
To unsubscribe
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 21:12:13 -0700 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It suspends OK, then during resume it gets partway through it, then everything
just stops.
Would prefer not to have to bisect this one - I've done enough bisecting this
week to last a lifetime, and bisecting git
(cc restored. Please always do reply-to-all)
(linux-acpi cc added)
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:00:41 +0200 tx tox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12 Lip 2006, 00:41, Eric Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I try toboota 2.6.17 kernel compiled forSMP(hyperthreading),
it hangs early in
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:14:08 +0200
Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ if (!hibernation_ops)
+ return -ENOSYS;
+
+ /*
+ * We have cancelled the power transition by running
+ * hibernation_ops-finish() before saving the image, so we should let
+ *
From: Zhang Rui [EMAIL PROTECTED]
File name should be unique in the same directory.
In order to keep the back-compatibility, only a warning is given
currently, but actions must be taken to fix it when such duplicates
are detected.
Bug report and a simple fix can be found here:
On Sun, 09 Sep 2007 13:35:26 +0200
Patrizio Bassi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patrizio Bassi ha scritto:
Jan Engelhardt ha scritto:
On Sep 8 2007 11:38, Patrizio Bassi wrote:
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
I shall give this a spin too, since I happen to have sis5513.
Just booted this
1 - 100 of 280 matches
Mail list logo
