Hi.
Jesse Barnes wrote:
Well, it seems like we'll have to fix drivers in either case, and isn't a
kexec approach fundamentally more sound and simple, design-wise? Rafael
pointed out some problems with properly setting wakeup states, but I think
that could be overcome...
No. AFAICS, kexec
Hi.
Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 09:45:02AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
- people keep talking about hibernating to an ext3 fs mounted on fuse as
a limitation of the freezer. To do that with kexec, you're still going
to have to bmap the ext3 fs and pass the block list
Hi.
Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:40:06AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi.
Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 09:45:02AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
- people keep talking about hibernating to an ext3 fs mounted on fuse as
a limitation of the freezer. To do
Hi.
Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:40:06AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Matthew Garrett wrote:
No, with a freezer-based model you can basically *never* suspend to
anything related to FUSE or a userspace USB device or anything involving
userspace iSCSI initiators
Hi Greg.
Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:17:06PM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi.
Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:40:06AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi.
Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 09:45:02AM +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
- people keep talking
Hi.
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Is there another mechanism preventing this?
Not at the kernel level, but you can prevent this from happening by running
mkswap on all swap spaces that refuse to come up after a fresh boot.
We really should do something about this. It should be possible to
handle
Hi.
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
I suppose we can always disable this when we start to support hardware
changing over hibernate (I have ideas in this direction - memory cold
plugging, for a start).
Well, if we support such features, we won't be following ACPI any more.
Mmm. Apparently I'm not
Hi.
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 3 of January 2008, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi.
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
I suppose we can always disable this when we start to support hardware
changing over hibernate (I have ideas in this direction - memory cold
plugging, for a start).
Well
Hi.
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 of January 2008, Erik Andrén wrote:
Hi,
2008/1/2, Shaohua Li [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
ACPI defines a hardware signature. BIOS calculates the signature
according to hardware configure, if hardware changes, the signature will
change, in this case, S4
Hi.
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 20:09:04 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, 11 July 2007 05:14, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 11:59:48 Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 11:39:37AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Yeah, that is a bit confusing
Hi.
On Thursday 12 July 2007 02:04:33 David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 10 July 2007, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Yeah, the bit I consider to be ugly is opening the files from within the
kernel, but it seemed to be necessary in order to provide the
functionality
without having to rely
Hi.
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 02:51:03 David Brownell wrote:
On Monday 09 July 2007, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi.
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 02:26:32 David Brownell wrote:
On Monday 09 July 2007, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 07:44:03PM -0700, David Brownell wrote
Hi.
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 10:45:50 Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 08:16:40AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Yeah, the bit I consider to be ugly is opening the files from within the
kernel, but it seemed to be necessary in order to provide the
functionality
without
Hi.
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 11:23:02 Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:53:35AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 10:45:50 Matthew Garrett wrote:
How are you going to shift into suspend to disk without going via
userspace? It's quite plausible
Hi.
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 11:59:48 Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 11:39:37AM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Yeah, that is a bit confusing. At the moment, I'm doing the suspend to ram
platform dependent preparation and cleanup in this scenario. That's
definitely
Hi.
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 02:26:32 David Brownell wrote:
On Monday 09 July 2007, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 07:44:03PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
Better a /sys/power/wakeup_event (or whatever) that's more easily
found. It could link to the device issuing the
Hi.
Sorry for my quietness. Looks pretty straightforward to me :)
Nigel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi.
On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 18:12 -0500, Len Brown wrote:
On Thursday 25 January 2007 14:47, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Note that a few RTCs ignore rtc_wkalrm.enabled when setting alarms, or
aren't set up correctly, so they won't yet behave with this attribute.
Signed-off-by:
Hi.
On Wed, 2007-01-24 at 21:03 -0500, Len Brown wrote:
Patch 03-05:
add ACPI sleep attributes in sysfs.
/proc/acpi/sleep is already deprecated by /sys/power/state.
Does that mean we drop standby (S1) capability on PCs?
I think we need to make /sys/power/state handle S1.
Hi.
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 06:28 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Contrary to popular belief, there are people who test -rc kernels
and report bugs.
And there are even people who test -git kernels.
Slightly off topic, but let me report a metoo as far as testing -git
goes (you can even find a
Hi Kristen.
Great to see this!
Allow me to anticipate a question I'm sure will come: will this play
well with (say) suspending while docked and resuming undocked?
Regards,
Nigel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-acpi in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi.
On Monday 10 July 2006 08:38, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sun, 9 Jul 2006, Brown, Len wrote:
So I ask you. If I fix the Kconfig issue today, will you accept
a push that restores this driver to 2.6.18?
Sure.
Great! Sorry Linus from me too - I've been assigned to watch this for Redhat
Hi Allan.
On Wednesday 12 April 2006 22:50, Cleaveland, AJ Allan @ IS wrote:
I'm trying to get hibernate to work on CentOS 4. What I really want to do
is use hibernate to start-up the machine every time. To do this I would
create an image to come out of hibernate with and set the machine to
Hi.
On Friday 14 April 2006 00:28, Felix Kuehling wrote:
On Tue, 2006-11-04 at 14:14 +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi.
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 12:35, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
if(acpi_during_suspend_resume)
don't generate power button event to confuse user space daemon
Hi.
On Tuesday 11 April 2006 12:35, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
if(acpi_during_suspend_resume)
don't generate power button event to confuse user space daemon
This patch might be useful useful in setting and unsetting
acpi_during_suspend_resume (and also using it, but you should ignore
Hi Greg.
On Thursday 06 April 2006 13:50, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 02:37:18PM +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi again.
On Friday 24 March 2006 14:04, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi.
Current git produces the following compile error (x86_64 uniprocessor
compile
Hi.
Current git produces the following compile error (x86_64 uniprocessor compile):
arch/x86_64/pci/mmconfig.c:152: error: conflicting types for ‘pci_mmcfg_init’
arch/i386/pci/pci.h:85: error: previous declaration of ‘pci_mmcfg_init’ was here
make[1]: *** [arch/x86_64/pci/mmconfig.o] Error 1
Hi Bernard.
On Sunday 05 February 2006 06:53, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
After the first suspend, do you have any processes sucking all
available cpu? This sounds like a thread that has been added since
2.6.15, which is being told to enter the freezer, but isn't doing
it. They usually end up
[ OOPS. Forward the wrong message. Will do the right one in a minute. Sorry! ]
pgpAmApGAxTIx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi.
On Saturday 04 February 2006 15:02, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
The gory details are at
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5989, but the short
summary:
With 2.6.15, S3 sleep and wake were 98% fine (once in a while waking
would hang, but I haven't managed to reproduce it). However,
30 matches
Mail list logo
