On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ugh, sorry, I was mistaken, it's not a cpufreq issue, it's a
CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP issue. Or that is what I was told before.
could be two issues:
one in cpufreq, and one in detect softlockup...
YH
-
To unsubscribe from
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I swear someone else sent this in, but my archives don't show it at all.
I think the patch below should solve this, but I need someone to test it.
I tested but it doesn't fix the problem for me. May be my problem is
different
When one cpu is set to offline, the caller process will hang, according to
the trace data, the problem lies in the refcount error in cpufreq driver,
cpufreq_cpu_callback will wait for completion policy-kobj_unregister
which is nerver completed because a refcount error in function
When one cpu is set to offline, the caller process will hang, according to
the trace data, the problem lies in the refcount error in cpufreq driver,
cpufreq_cpu_callback will wait for completion policy-kobj_unregister
which is nerver completed because a refcount error in function
On Friday 15 February 2008, Greg KH wrote:
I swear someone sent this patch in before. Can you try this one below,
there seems to be an imbalance with kobject_get and _put.
I did remember seeing this patch before [1] and can confirm that it does
indeed fix the issue: with this patch applied to
-Original Message-
From: Zhao, Yakui
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 12:21 PM
To: Thomas, Sujith
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; Zhang, Rui
Subject: Re: [patch 4/6] ACPI processor: extract return
values using PTR_ERR
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 10:54 +0530,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:24:52AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
as of 2.6.25-rc1, there is no more /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video1 which
controlled LVDS backlight on Lenovo ThinkPad T61. There is still
acpi_video0 which seems to have sane values but echo N brightness has no
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 04:10:50PM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote:
Why do you want to still export the temperature via ACPI sysfs paths
then?
Once it is there and userspace progs make use of it, you will have
to
maintain it forever and HAL is getting crazy and must take care
about:
-
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:24:52AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
as of 2.6.25-rc1, there is no more /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video1 which
controlled LVDS backlight on Lenovo ThinkPad T61. There is still
acpi_video0 which seems to
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 04:34:34PM +0530, Thomas, Sujith wrote:
Len had mentioned in one of his responses that there is scope for
evolving
and we can do that. As you pointed out if there are
differences in the way temperatures are reported out, we can go ahead
and
fix it.
That's fine, but
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:02:13PM +0100, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
2.6.24 kernel has two acpi_video[01]. 2.6.25-rc1 does not, it contains only
acpi_video0 (even in text mode in single user without X being loaded) which
does not work at all.
Sigh. Ok. Could you attach the output of acpidump and
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 04:34:34PM +0530, Thomas, Sujith wrote:
Len had mentioned in one of his responses that there is scope for
evolving
and we can do that. As you pointed out if there are
differences in the way temperatures are reported out,
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:07:20PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:02:13PM +0100, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
2.6.24 kernel has two acpi_video[01]. 2.6.25-rc1 does not, it contains only
acpi_video0 (even in text mode in single user without X being loaded) which
does not
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Yi Yang wrote:
This patch adds kobject_put to balance refcount. I noticed Greg suggests
it will fix a power-off issue to remove kobject_get statement block, but i
think that isn't the best way because those code block has existed very long
and it is helpful because the
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 10:52:51AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Yi Yang wrote:
This patch adds kobject_put to balance refcount. I noticed Greg suggests
it will fix a power-off issue to remove kobject_get statement block, but i
think that isn't the best way because those
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 2:19 AM, Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 15 February 2008, Greg KH wrote:
I swear someone sent this patch in before. Can you try this one below,
there seems to be an imbalance with kobject_get and _put.
I did remember seeing this patch before [1] and
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Yinghai Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 2:19 AM, Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 15 February 2008, Greg KH wrote:
I swear someone sent this patch in before. Can you try this one below,
there seems to be an imbalance
The function itself is defined just below,
so this prototype is not really useful.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/acpi/processor_core.c |2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
On Friday, 15 of February 2008, Len Brown wrote:
On Sunday 03 February 2008 17:20, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Three suspend-related fixes that IMO can go into 2.6.25 follow.
ACK on all three. Yes, these seem easy enough for 2.6.25.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 07:48:41AM +0800, Yi Yang wrote:
When one cpu is set to offline, the caller process will hang, according to
the trace data, the problem lies in the refcount error in cpufreq driver,
cpufreq_cpu_callback will wait for completion policy-kobj_unregister
which is nerver
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 04:52:18PM +0800, Jeff Chua wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I swear someone else sent this in, but my archives don't show it at all.
I think the patch below should solve this, but I need someone to test it.
I tested but it
For consistency, use ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT instead of printk
in acpi_processor_hotplug_notify() for BUS_CHECK and DEVICE_CHECK
events
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/acpi/processor_core.c |5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
Since SuSE ships with CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG=y,
the line between printk and ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT is less clear.
I.e. this printk will be present in a production shipping distro kernel
even if you move to to ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT from printk.
The only variable is the default verbosity level.
Thomas, what
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:51:15 -0800 (PST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9995
Summary: 2.6.25-rc1 regression - IBM ACPI backlight controlls do
not work
Product: ACPI
Version: 2.5
KernelVersion:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:19:20AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Friday 15 February 2008, Greg KH wrote:
I swear someone sent this patch in before. Can you try this one below,
there seems to be an imbalance with kobject_get and _put.
I did remember seeing this patch before [1] and can
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 12:41:43AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ugh, sorry, I was mistaken, it's not a cpufreq issue, it's a
CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP issue. Or that is what I was told before.
could be two issues:
one
On Sunday 03 February 2008 17:20, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Three suspend-related fixes that IMO can go into 2.6.25 follow.
ACK on all three. Yes, these seem easy enough for 2.6.25.
Pavel
1 2 applied.
lets re-send #3
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 11:38:59AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 2:19 AM, Frans Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 15 February 2008, Greg KH wrote:
I swear someone sent this patch in before. Can you try this one below,
there seems to be an imbalance with
applied.
thanks,
-len
On Thursday 14 February 2008 19:34, Zhao Yakui wrote:
Subject: ACPI: Check whether cooling device exists before unregistering it
From : Zhao Yakui [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OS should check whether the cooling device exists before it is unregistered.
If it doesn't exists, it
Len Brown wrote:
I.e. this printk will be present in a production shipping distro kernel
even if you move to to ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT from printk.
Yes, but you can still disable it. And if you do, all the messages will
vanish, but this will stay.
The only variable is the default verbosity level.
No, this one is a bug. I'll try to deal with it.
--
Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-acpi in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
refreshed in acpi-test branch.
thanks,
-len
On Friday 15 February 2008 05:46, Thomas, Sujith wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Zhao, Yakui
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 12:21 PM
To: Thomas, Sujith
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; Zhang, Rui
Subject: Re:
The TM4200 series use the same method as the TM2490 series to control the
mail LED, so add a DMI based quirk for these laptops.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Corbacho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/misc/acer-wmi.c |9 +
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0
Thanks to Damjan [EMAIL PROTECTED] for noticing this one.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/misc/thinkpad_acpi.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/misc/thinkpad_acpi.c b/drivers/misc/thinkpad_acpi.c
index
Fix a stray ibm-acpi that should have been replaced with thinkpad-acpi.
Thanks to Damjan [EMAIL PROTECTED] for noticing this one.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Documentation/laptops/thinkpad-acpi.txt |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
The open() and close() hooks for the input device are useful even when
hotkey NVRAM polling support is not in use, so it is better to always have
them around.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/misc/thinkpad_acpi.c | 13 -
1 files changed, 8
Len,
This patchset has my current thinkpad-acpi queue with fixes that should go
into 2.6.25-rc.
There are some minor obviously correct fixes, some typo fixes, and an event
interface change that I'd rather get into 2.6.25, since the interface that
is being changed was introduced in my previous
A quick study of the 0x5009/0x500A HKEY event on the X61t DSDT revealed the
existence of the EC HTAB register (EC 0x0f, bit 7), and a compare with the
X41t DSDT shows that HKEY.MHKG can be used to verify if the ThinkPad is
tablet-capable (MHKG present), and in tablet mode (bit 3 of MHKG return is
Fix a few spelling errors, and also document the EV_SW events thinkpad-acpi
can issue.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Documentation/laptops/thinkpad-acpi.txt | 48 +-
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git
Fixes some minor points in the radio switch code and docs.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Documentation/laptops/thinkpad-acpi.txt |2 +-
drivers/misc/thinkpad_acpi.c|8
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git
The video output port control feature is not very useful on many ThinkPads
(especially when a X server is running), and lately userspace is getting
better and better at it, so it makes sense to allow users to stripe out the
thinkpad-acpi video feature from their kernels and save at least 2KB.
Issue EV_SW SW_TABLET_MODE events for HKEY events 0x5009 and 0x500A on the
X41t/X60t/X61t. As usual, we suppress the HKEY events on the netlink
interface to avoid sending duplicate events to userspace.
Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c: In function 'acpi_save_state_mem':
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c:55: warning: passing argument 1 of
'native_store_gdt' from incompatible pointer type
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c:71: warning: assignment makes integer from pointer
without a cast
On Friday 15 February 2008 23:17, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
The video output port control feature is not very useful on many ThinkPads
(especially when a X server is running), and lately userspace is getting
better and better at it, so it makes sense to allow users to stripe out the
applied
thanks,
-len
On Friday 15 February 2008 19:02, Carlos Corbacho wrote:
The TM4200 series use the same method as the TM2490 series to control the
mail LED, so add a DMI based quirk for these laptops.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Corbacho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Len Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
yeah, i know.
Linus personally created this one last week.
We're waiting for him to cool off before we re-suggest a patch that actually
works:-)
-Len
On Friday 15 February 2008 23:47, Andrew Morton wrote:
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/sleep.c: In function 'acpi_save_state_mem':
46 matches
Mail list logo
