Re: Fan speeds on HP nc6400 and nc8430

I managed to get a HP NX 6330 laptop to test HP laptop related issues discussed here. But the bug http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7813 seems to be NOT reproducible on my NX6330. This fact prompt if there are any essential difference between NX6330 and NC6400. The BIOS of my NX6330 even

RE: Bad libata resume behaviour due to ACPICA change (in acpi-test)

T43 2668-NG2 BIOS 1.23 EC 1.03 -Original Message- From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 2:59 AM To: Starikovskiy, Alexey Y Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; Brown, Len Subject: Re: Bad libata resume behaviour due to ACPICA change (in

T43 BIOS and AHCI

On Tue, 06 Feb 2007, Starikovskiy, Alexey Y wrote: T43 2668-NG2 BIOS 1.23 EC 1.03 We use the same BIOS (TP-1Y), but you are using a very old version. A lot might have changed since then, including AHCI support going away. I don't think I ever run a 1.23 bios on my machine... And I know for a

RE: Thermal resume regression

Hi, Could you try the patch from http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7887 to see if it's related? Regards. Konstantin. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-acpi- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Demleitner Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 6:36 PM To:

Re: T43 BIOS and AHCI

Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Tue, 06 Feb 2007, Starikovskiy, Alexey Y wrote: T43 2668-NG2 BIOS 1.23 EC 1.03 I updated to 1.29/1.06 and still have 6 seconds resume time... We use the same BIOS (TP-1Y), but you are using a very old version. A lot might have changed since

Re: Fan speeds on HP nc6400 and nc8430

On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 19:58 +0800, Luming Yu wrote: I managed to get a HP NX 6330 laptop to test HP laptop related issues discussed here. But the bug http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7813 seems to be NOT reproducible on my NX6330. This fact prompt if there are any essential

Re: [patch 09/13] acpi: add backlight support to the sony_acpi driver

On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 16:09 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Alessandro Guido [EMAIL PROTECTED] Make the sony_acpi use the backlight subsystem to adjust brightness value instead of using the /proc/sony/brightness file. (Other settings will still have a /proc/sony/... entry)

Re: [patch 03/13] asus_acpi: Add support for Asus Z81SP

Le Tuesday 06 February 2007 01:09:09 [EMAIL PROTECTED], vous avez écrit : From: Matthew C Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Adds support in asus_acpi for the Asus Z81SP laptop. This preserves all old functionality when improperly detected as well as enabling Bluetooth support. I don't know if this

[-mm patch] #ifdef ACPI_FUTURE_USAGE acpi_os_readable()

On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 08:45:28PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: ... Changes since 2.6.20-rc6-mm2: ... git-acpi.patch ... git trees ... acpi_os_readable() is no longer used. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/acpi/osl.c |2 -- include/acpi/acpiosxf.h |3

[PATCH 1/2] ACPI: ibm-acpi: add Ultrabay support for the T60p ThinkPad

From: Theodore Ts'o [EMAIL PROTECTED] The following patch adds support for obtaining the status and ejecting Ultrabay devices for the T60p Thinkpad; my guess is that it probably works on T60 Thinkpads and probably more recent Lenovo latops as well. With the 2.03 BIOS I have been able to eject a

[PATCH 2/2] ACPI: ibm-acpi: cleanup init and exit paths

This patch fixes a small memory leak on module removal, and does other assorted minor cleanups on the module init codepath. Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- drivers/acpi/ibm_acpi.c | 13 - 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: ACPI bytecode hardware registers access

Is your ioport included in the microsoft's list being blocked by XP? Please give me an example (acpidump output from a real box) that demonstrates ACPI is missing something which must be done through native driver. I'm wondering the designer of the box should already known AML code will directly