Re: [PATCH net-next v5 12/12] sock: Add SO_RCVTIMEO_NEW and SO_SNDTIMEO_NEW

2019-02-08 Thread Deepa Dinamani
> You touched powerpc in the previous patch but not this one. > > That's because we use the asm-generic version I assume. That is correct. > Would be good to mention in the change log though to avoid any confusion. I'm not sure how to do that now. It looks like the series has already been

Re: [PATCH-tip 00/22] locking/rwsem: Rework rwsem-xadd & enable new rwsem features

2019-02-08 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 12:31 PM Waiman Long wrote: > > > (b) what's the new fastpath case > > The only change in the fastpath is the use of cmpxchg for writer lock. .. since a big deal here was about using the generic atomic accessor functions, I really was looking forward to seeing the

Re: [PATCH-tip 00/22] locking/rwsem: Rework rwsem-xadd & enable new rwsem features

2019-02-08 Thread Waiman Long
On 02/08/2019 02:50 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 11:08 AM Waiman Long wrote: >> This patchset revamps the current rwsem-xadd implementation to make >> it saner and easier to work with. This patchset removes all the >> architecture specific assembly code and uses generic C

Re: [PATCH-tip 00/22] locking/rwsem: Rework rwsem-xadd & enable new rwsem features

2019-02-08 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 11:08 AM Waiman Long wrote: > > This patchset revamps the current rwsem-xadd implementation to make > it saner and easier to work with. This patchset removes all the > architecture specific assembly code and uses generic C code for all > architectures. This eases

Re: [PATCH-tip 15/22] locking/rwsem: Merge owner into count on x86-64

2019-02-08 Thread Waiman Long
On 02/07/2019 03:54 PM, Waiman Long wrote: > On 02/07/2019 03:08 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 02:07:19PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote: >>> On 32-bit architectures, there aren't enough bits to hold both. >>> 64-bit architectures, however, can have enough bits to do that. For >>>