Hi Christian,
For next revision, could you also CC sur...@google.com as well? He is also
working on the low memory killer. And also suggest CC to
kernel-t...@android.com. And mentioned some comments below, thanks.
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 03:59:42PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
[snip]
> diff
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 07:25:08PM -0700, Daniel Colascione wrote:
[...]
> > But anyway, I think this runtime detection thing is not needed. THP is
> > actually expected to be as fast as this anyway, so if that's available then
> > we should already be as fast.
>
> Ah, I think the commit message
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 06:54:33PM -0700, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> I wonder whether it makes sense to expose to userspace somehow whether
> mremap is "fast" for a particular architecture. If a feature relies on
> fast mremap, it might be better for some userland component to disable
> that
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 06:39:45PM -0700, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> Not 32-bit ARM?
Well, I didn't want to enable every possible architecture we could in a
single go. Certainly arm32 can be a follow on enablement as can be other
architectures. The point of this series is to upstream this feature
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 11:18:36AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Joel Fernandes
[...]
> > Also, do we not flush the caches from any path when we munmap
> > address space? We do call do_munmap on the old mapping from mremap
> > after moving to the new one.
>
> S
