Re: [PATCH] 4.18-rc7 on alpha: bitsperlong issue

2019-01-22 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Hi Bob,

On 1/21/19 10:42 PM, Bob Tracy wrote:
> Apologies for what is essentially a repost with a proper subject header
> in the sense of trying to get the attention of people who collect/approve
> patches for submission upstream.  See my posting from earlier today
> (followup: [FTBFS] kernel 4.18-rc7 bitsperlong.h issue on alpha) for the
> back story.  As mentioned there, this patch applies cleanly to at least
> all mainline kernel source trees >= version 4.18.
> 
> Further apologies for including the patch as an attachment, but I don't
> trust my mailer not to impose unintended formatting.
> 
> --Bob
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bob Tracy 
> Tested-by: Bob Tracy 

With your "Signed-off-by" tag, the "Tested-by" tag is implicit,
it is expected patches are at least tested by the contributor ;)

That said,
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 

Thanks for fixing this,

Phil.


Re: [PATCH] 4.18-rc7 on alpha: bitsperlong issue

2019-01-21 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 1:42 PM Bob Tracy  wrote:
>
> Apologies for what is essentially a repost with a proper subject header
> in the sense of trying to get the attention of people who collect/approve
> patches for submission upstream.  See my posting from earlier today
> (followup: [FTBFS] kernel 4.18-rc7 bitsperlong.h issue on alpha) for the
> back story.  As mentioned there, this patch applies cleanly to at least
> all mainline kernel source trees >= version 4.18.
>
> Further apologies for including the patch as an attachment, but I don't
> trust my mailer not to impose unintended formatting.

Thanks Bob. I've vacuumed the patch up and will include it in a pull req soon.


[PATCH] 4.18-rc7 on alpha: bitsperlong issue

2019-01-21 Thread Bob Tracy
Apologies for what is essentially a repost with a proper subject header
in the sense of trying to get the attention of people who collect/approve
patches for submission upstream.  See my posting from earlier today
(followup: [FTBFS] kernel 4.18-rc7 bitsperlong.h issue on alpha) for the
back story.  As mentioned there, this patch applies cleanly to at least
all mainline kernel source trees >= version 4.18.

Further apologies for including the patch as an attachment, but I don't
trust my mailer not to impose unintended formatting.

--Bob

Signed-off-by: Bob Tracy 
Tested-by: Bob Tracy 
--- a/tools/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h  2019-01-20 14:40:32.522422998 
-0600
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h  2019-01-21 09:51:45.336938260 
-0600
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
 #include "../../arch/mips/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h"
 #elif defined(__ia64__)
 #include "../../arch/ia64/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h"
+#elif defined(__alpha__)
+#include "../../arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h"
 #else
 #include 
 #endif