On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 2:07 AM Kees Cook wrote:
> Rename RW_DATA_SECTION to RW_DATA. (Calling this a "section" is a lie,
> since it's multiple sections and section flags cannot be applied to
> the macro.)
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook
> arch/m68k/kernel/vmlinux-nommu.lds | 2 +-
> arch/m68k/k
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 2:07 AM Kees Cook wrote:
> Finish renaming RO_DATA_SECTION to RO_DATA. (Calling this a "section"
> is a lie, since it's multiple sections and section flags cannot be
> applied to the macro.)
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook
> arch/m68k/kernel/vmlinux-nommu.lds | 2 +-
For m
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 05:05:41PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> The Program Header identifiers are internal to the linker scripts. In
> preparation for moving the NOTES segment declaration into RO_DATA,
> standardize the identifier for the PT_NOTE entry to "note" as used by
> all other architectures t
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:27:54AM +0800, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> But I failed to see why the above is related to making node_to_cpumask_map()
> NUMA_NO_NODE aware?
Your initial bug is for hns3, which is a PCI device, which really _MUST_
have a node assigned.
It not having one, is a straight up bug
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 05:07:04PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Kees Cook writes:
> > In preparation for moving NOTES into RO_DATA, remove the PT_NOTE
> > workaround since the kernel requires at least gcc 4.6 now.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:25:19AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 05:05:41PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > The Program Header identifiers are internal to the linker scripts. In
> > preparation for moving the NOTES segment declaration into RO_DATA,
> > standardize the ident
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 09:11:43AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 03:25:19AM -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 05:05:41PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > The Program Header identifiers are internal to the linker scripts. In
> > > preparation for moving th
On 2019-10-10, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 10:42 PM Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> >
> > --- a/fs/namei.c
> > +++ b/fs/namei.c
> > @@ -2277,6 +2277,11 @@ static const char *path_init(struct nameidata *nd,
> > unsigned flags)
> >
> > nd->m_seq = read_seqbegin(&mount_lock);
> >
>
On 2019-10-12, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> On 2019-10-10, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 10:42 PM Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> > >
> > > --- a/fs/namei.c
> > > +++ b/fs/namei.c
> > > @@ -2277,6 +2277,11 @@ static const char *path_init(struct nameidata *nd,
> > > unsigned flags)
> > >
> > >
add pci and acpi maintainer
cc linux-...@vger.kernel.org and linux-a...@vger.kernel.org
On 2019/10/11 19:15, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:27:54AM +0800, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
>> But I failed to see why the above is related to making node_to_cpumask_map()
>> NUMA_NO_NODE aware?
10 matches
Mail list logo