On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 15:49:07 -0800 Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 12:42:07AM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 06:44:49PM +0100, Remi Colinet wrote:
This patch add a new /proc/mempool file in order to display mempool usage.
The feature can be disabled with
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 10:12 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 15:49:07 -0800 Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 12:42:07AM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 06:44:49PM +0100, Remi Colinet wrote:
This patch add a new /proc/mempool file in order to
On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 13:13:31 -0600
Matt Mackall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 10:12 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 15:49:07 -0800 Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 12:42:07AM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 06:44:49PM +0100,
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:02 PM, Andrew Morton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 13:13:31 -0600
Matt Mackall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 10:12 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 15:49:07 -0800 Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 12:42:07AM
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 00:02 +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
Hi Linus,
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Pekka Enberg wrote:
Hmm, I thought Documentation/ABI/ was supposed to tell us what's an
ABI you can depend on and what's not. I mean, you shouldn't be
depending on anything but the interfaces documented
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Pekka Enberg wrote:
OK, but why do we have those different ABI stages in
Documentation/ABI then? The README file there seems to contradict what
you say. Or maybe I'm reading it wrong...
I think that whole Documentation/ABI stuff is utter tosh, and should just
be thrown
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 12:42:07AM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 06:44:49PM +0100, Remi Colinet wrote:
This patch add a new /proc/mempool file in order to display mempool usage.
The feature can be disabled with CONFIG_PROC_MEMPOOL=N during kernel
configuration.
