On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 02:27:40PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
I agree it looks a bit odd and I'm willing to do the code reorg if
there is a better way. But I definitely wouldn't call this as
See the suggestion I made in the previous mail - try doing it by making
the change, then backing it
On 12/20/10 04:39, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 02:44:28PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
static int regulator_check_consumers(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
+struct regulator *ignore,
int *min_uV, int *max_uV)
If the consumer state is updated but an error is returned due to
consumer constraint issues, then all set voltages by all consumers on
the regulator will fail till the bad consumer updates its voltage
range with a compatible value. A bad consumer request that's rejected
shouldn't prevent other
