On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:19:30PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Daniel Walker dwal...@fifo99.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 05:36:58PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Daniel Walker dwal...@fifo99.com wrote:
So the current
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 5:07 AM, Daniel Walker dwal...@fifo99.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:19:30PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Daniel Walker dwal...@fifo99.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 05:36:58PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30,
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 08:53:58AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 5:07 AM, Daniel Walker dwal...@fifo99.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:19:30PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Daniel Walker dwal...@fifo99.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30,
Daniel Walker dwal...@fifo99.com writes:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 04:08:27PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net writes:
I would be very happy to take more code for the older Qualcomm chipset
to enable full functionality for them, but it's been my impression
that far
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:12:03AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Daniel Walker dwal...@fifo99.com writes:
No. The idea behind splitting them is to allow current platforms with
active maintainers to progress without being held back. The older
platforms can stay and have an opportunity to
Daniel Walker dwal...@fifo99.com writes:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:12:03AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Daniel Walker dwal...@fifo99.com writes:
No. The idea behind splitting them is to allow current platforms with
active maintainers to progress without being held back. The older
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:35:06AM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
ARM and the sub-architectures is already confusing I don't think we need
to start compounding the problem by allowing random whatever-you-want
sub-directories from every sub-architecture.
Confusing?
I'm not sure about that. It's
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:51:34AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Daniel Walker dwal...@fifo99.com writes:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:12:03AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Daniel Walker dwal...@fifo99.com writes:
No. The idea behind splitting them is to allow current platforms with
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 07:23:30PM +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:35:06AM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
ARM and the sub-architectures is already confusing I don't think we need
to start compounding the problem by allowing random whatever-you-want
Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net writes:
I would be very happy to take more code for the older Qualcomm chipset
to enable full functionality for them, but it's been my impression
that far from all that is needed to make it a useful platform is in
the upstream kernel, and there's been no signs of
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 04:08:27PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net writes:
I would be very happy to take more code for the older Qualcomm chipset
to enable full functionality for them, but it's been my impression
that far from all that is needed to make it a
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Daniel Walker dwal...@fifo99.com wrote:
So the current users of those platforms are, what SOL ?
What users? Show me one.
-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-arm-msm in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 05:36:58PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Daniel Walker dwal...@fifo99.com wrote:
So the current users of those platforms are, what SOL ?
What users? Show me one.
What am I chop liver ?
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Daniel Walker dwal...@fifo99.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 05:36:58PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Daniel Walker dwal...@fifo99.com wrote:
So the current users of those platforms are, what SOL ?
What users? Show me one.
Daniel,
I would be very happy to take more code for the older Qualcomm chipset
to enable full functionality for them, but it's been my impression
that far from all that is needed to make it a useful platform is in
the upstream kernel, and there's been no signs of more of it showing
up at least in
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 08:37:28AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
Daniel,
I would be very happy to take more code for the older Qualcomm chipset
to enable full functionality for them, but it's been my impression
that far from all that is needed to make it a useful platform is in
the upstream
* Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net [131029 10:40]:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Daniel Walker dwal...@fifo99.com wrote:
Personally I think splitting mach- stuff isn't very useful or
interesting.. There's just no technical reason for it, for example x86
and x86_64 was a win from my
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:39:45AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Daniel Walker dwal...@fifo99.com wrote:
Personally I think splitting mach- stuff isn't very useful or
interesting.. There's just no technical reason for it, for example x86
and x86_64 was a
18 matches
Mail list logo
