RE: [PATCH V3 1/2] scsi: ufs: Add support for host assisted background operations

2013-07-19 Thread Seungwon Jeon
On Thu, July 18, 2013, Sujit Reddy Thumma wrote: I'm not sure that BKOPS with runtime-pm associates. Do you think it's helpful for power management? How about hibernation scheme for runtime-pm? I'm testing and I can introduce soon. Well, I am thinking on following approach when we

Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] scsi: ufs: Add support for host assisted background operations

2013-07-19 Thread Sujit Reddy Thumma
I'm not sure that BKOPS with runtime-pm associates. Do you think it's helpful for power management? How about hibernation scheme for runtime-pm? I'm testing and I can introduce soon. Well, I am thinking on following approach when we introduce power management. ufshcd_runtime_suspend() {

RE: [PATCH V3 1/2] scsi: ufs: Add support for host assisted background operations

2013-07-17 Thread Seungwon Jeon
On Thu, July 11, 2013, Sujit Reddy Thumma wrote: On 7/10/2013 7:01 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote: I'm not sure that BKOPS with runtime-pm associates. Do you think it's helpful for power management? How about hibernation scheme for runtime-pm? I'm testing and I can introduce soon. Well, I am

Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] scsi: ufs: Add support for host assisted background operations

2013-07-17 Thread Sujit Reddy Thumma
I'm not sure that BKOPS with runtime-pm associates. Do you think it's helpful for power management? How about hibernation scheme for runtime-pm? I'm testing and I can introduce soon. Well, I am thinking on following approach when we introduce power management. ufshcd_runtime_suspend() {

Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] scsi: ufs: Add support for host assisted background operations

2013-07-11 Thread Sujit Reddy Thumma
On 7/10/2013 7:01 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote: I'm not sure that BKOPS with runtime-pm associates. Do you think it's helpful for power management? How about hibernation scheme for runtime-pm? I'm testing and I can introduce soon. Well, I am thinking on following approach when we introduce power

RE: [PATCH V3 1/2] scsi: ufs: Add support for host assisted background operations

2013-07-10 Thread Seungwon Jeon
I'm not sure that BKOPS with runtime-pm associates. Do you think it's helpful for power management? How about hibernation scheme for runtime-pm? I'm testing and I can introduce soon. On Tue, July 09, 2013, Sujit Reddy Thumma wrote: Background operations in the UFS device can be disabled by the

[PATCH V3 1/2] scsi: ufs: Add support for host assisted background operations

2013-07-09 Thread Sujit Reddy Thumma
Background operations in the UFS device can be disabled by the host to reduce the response latency of transfer requests. Add support for enabling/disabling the background operations during runtime suspend/resume of the device. If the device is in critical need of BKOPS it will raise an

Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] scsi: ufs: Add support for host assisted background operations

2013-07-09 Thread merez
Tested-by: Maya Erez me...@codeaurora.org Background operations in the UFS device can be disabled by the host to reduce the response latency of transfer requests. Add support for enabling/disabling the background operations during runtime suspend/resume of the device. If the device is in