Re: [RFC 1/6] drm: Add top level Kconfig option for DRM fbdev emulation

2015-06-30 Thread Benjamin Gaignard
Hi, I think that what have been done by Rob with module_param is also a good idea: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c?id=e90dfec78ec288d6c89a7b508a5c5d4ae8b7f934 Can you mix compilation flag and module param ? Benjamin

Re: [RFC 1/6] drm: Add top level Kconfig option for DRM fbdev emulation

2015-06-30 Thread Archit Taneja
Hi, On 06/30/2015 02:01 PM, Benjamin Gaignard wrote: Hi, I think that what have been done by Rob with module_param is also a good idea: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c?id=e90dfec78ec288d6c89a7b508a5c5d4ae8b7f934 Can you mix

Re: [RFC 1/6] drm: Add top level Kconfig option for DRM fbdev emulation

2015-06-30 Thread Archit Taneja
Hi, On 06/30/2015 12:40 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: Any updates on this or too much distractions? I really think doing this would be awesome for the drm subsystem, instead of reinventing this wheel for each driver. I'd started on this again. I've got more free time now than before, so I should

Re: [PATCH v6 0/9] Add simple NVMEM Framework via regmap.

2015-06-30 Thread Stefan Wahren
Hi Srinivas, Srinivas Kandagatla srinivas.kandaga...@linaro.org hat am 24. Juni 2015 um 20:50 geschrieben: On 24/06/15 18:47, Stefan Wahren wrote: Hi Srinivas, Srinivas Kandagatla srinivas.kandaga...@linaro.org hat am 24. Juni 2015 um 15:03 geschrieben: On 24/06/15

Re: [RFC 1/6] drm: Add top level Kconfig option for DRM fbdev emulation

2015-06-30 Thread Daniel Vetter
Any updates on this or too much distractions? I really think doing this would be awesome for the drm subsystem, instead of reinventing this wheel for each driver. -Daniel On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote: On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 01:47:54PM +0530, Archit

Re: [PATCH] firmware: qcom: scm: Peripheral Authentication Service

2015-06-30 Thread Andy Gross
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 12:46:19PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote: snip While adding the 64 bit interface it might be of interest to extract the dma allocation in __qcom_scm_pas_init_image() into the common code and pass the physical pointer to instead, but I haven't looked at the differences