On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 11:16 -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
I will look further into this if I have time, but at this point I'm
still skeptical whether this is the right fix. The reason I went from
sure to skeptical is due to the deferred clock delay code in the driver.
Saravana,
Let me try
On 01/24/2011 04:44 AM, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 11:16 -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
I will look further into this if I have time, but at this point I'm
still skeptical whether this is the right fix. The reason I went from
sure to skeptical is due to the deferred clock
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:25 -0800, David Brown wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/include/mach/cpu.h
b/arch/arm/mach-msm/include/mach/cpu.h
index e1ba9db..a9481b0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/include/mach/cpu.h
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/include/mach/cpu.h
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
#define
On Mon, Jan 24 2011, Daniel Walker wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:25 -0800, David Brown wrote:
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2007 Google, Inc.
+ * Copyright (c) 2008-2011, Code Aurora Forum. All rights reserved.
+ * Author: Brian Swetland swetl...@google.com
Brian didn't really write this did he?
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 13:31 -0800, David Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24 2011, Daniel Walker wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:25 -0800, David Brown wrote:
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2007 Google, Inc.
+ * Copyright (c) 2008-2011, Code Aurora Forum. All rights reserved.
+ * Author: Brian Swetland
On Mon, Jan 24 2011, Daniel Walker wrote:
What do you want me to call it?
#define cpu_is_97d0c886-3768-4998-8925-16f36209d0d1()
I want you to call it msm8x60 ..
msm8960 is not a subset of msm8x60. It's just a misleading name. It's
a very different device, and needs it's own identifier.
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 14:13 -0800, David Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24 2011, Daniel Walker wrote:
What do you want me to call it?
#define cpu_is_97d0c886-3768-4998-8925-16f36209d0d1()
I want you to call it msm8x60 ..
msm8960 is not a subset of msm8x60. It's just a misleading
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:25 -0800, David Brown wrote:
+ int global_offset = 0;
+
+ if (cpu_is_msm7x01()) {
+ msm_clocks[MSM_CLOCK_GPT].regbase = MSM_CSR_BASE;
+ msm_clocks[MSM_CLOCK_DGT].regbase = MSM_CSR_BASE + 0x10;
+ } else if
On Mon, Jan 24 2011, Daniel Walker wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:25 -0800, David Brown wrote:
+ int global_offset = 0;
+
+ if (cpu_is_msm7x01()) {
+ msm_clocks[MSM_CLOCK_GPT].regbase = MSM_CSR_BASE;
+ msm_clocks[MSM_CLOCK_DGT].regbase = MSM_CSR_BASE
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:25 -0800, David Brown wrote:
+#define INT_VGIC (GIC_PPI_START + 0)
+#define INT_DEBUG_TIMER_EXP(GIC_PPI_START + 1)
+#define INT_GP_TIMER_EXP (GIC_PPI_START + 2)
+#define INT_GP_TIMER2_EXP
On Mon, Jan 24 2011, Daniel Walker wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:25 -0800, David Brown wrote:
+#define SC_AVSCPUXUP (GIC_PPI_START + 12)
+#define SC_SICCPUXACGIRPTREQ (GIC_PPI_START + 13)
+#define SC_SICCPUXEXTFAULTIRPTREQ
On Mon, Jan 24 2011, Daniel Walker wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 14:44 -0800, David Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24 2011, Daniel Walker wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:25 -0800, David Brown wrote:
+ int global_offset = 0;
+
+ if (cpu_is_msm7x01()) {
+
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:25:47PM -0800, David Brown wrote:
--- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-msm8960.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-msm8960.c
@@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ static void __init msm8960_init_irq(void)
/* Edge trigger PPIs except AVS_SVICINT and AVS_SVICINTSWDONE */
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 12:25:41PM -0800, David Brown wrote:
From: Stepan Moskovchenko step...@codeaurora.org
Add the physical memory offset value for the Qualcomm
MSM8960 chip.
Signed-off-by: Stepan Moskovchenko step...@codeaurora.org
Signed-off-by: David Brown dav...@codeaurora.org
---
These two patches fix some problems with the MMC/SD driver for MSM
chips. The first fixes a compilation error. The driver was using
internal DMA apis, this fix changes it to use the proper APIs. The
second patch fixes a clock enable/disable mismatch.
Thanks,
David Brown
The following changes
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:25 -0800, David Brown wrote:
+#define cpu_is_msm7x01() 0
+#define cpu_is_msm7x30() 0
+#define cpu_is_qsd8x50() 0
+#define cpu_is_msm8x60() 0
Now that I look at this again, why not drop the x all together ?
Daniel
--
Sent by a consultant of
On Mon, Jan 24 2011, Daniel Walker wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:25 -0800, David Brown wrote:
+#define cpu_is_msm7x01() 0
+#define cpu_is_msm7x30() 0
+#define cpu_is_qsd8x50() 0
+#define cpu_is_msm8x60() 0
Now that I look at this again, why not drop the x all
On Mon, Jan 24 2011, Daniel Walker wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 16:20 -0800, David Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24 2011, Daniel Walker wrote:
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:25 -0800, David Brown wrote:
+#define cpu_is_msm7x01() 0
+#define cpu_is_msm7x30() 0
+#define cpu_is_qsd8x50()
On Fri, Jan 21 2011, Stepan Moskovchenko wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/devices-msm8960.c
b/arch/arm/mach-msm/devices-msm8960.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..821e6d1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/devices-msm8960.c
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2008 Google,
These patches were previously posted as part of a larger series.
I've refreshed these against the latest msm for-next branch.
They cleanup debugfs and the clock code and add support for
some proc_comm clocks.
Matt Wagantall (1):
msm: clock: Move debugfs code from clock.c to clock-debug.c
From: Matt Wagantall ma...@codeaurora.org
The clock debugfs code is large enough, and easy enough to separate,
that it deserves its own file which is compiled only when
CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is enabled.
Also, cleanup header file #includes that are no longer required.
Reviewed-by: Saravana Kannan
Support the CE_CLK and CODEC_SSBI_CLK. Also add support for uart,
and i2c clocks on targets which support proc_comm clocks.
Reviewed-by: Saravana Kannan skan...@codeaurora.org
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd sb...@codeaurora.org
---
arch/arm/mach-msm/clock-pcom.h |4 +++-
Hi,
I am looking for ways to download audio calibration data to a
co-processor under ALSA framework. I would like to know if there is
already a precedent which handles this use case. I considered
request_firmware() approach but there are few drawbacks to this
approach. The audio calibration
23 matches
Mail list logo
