Re: [LAD] audio function generator ?

2010-01-31 Thread Dave Phillips
Folderol wrote: On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 09:51:13PM +, Victor Lazzarini wrote: what do you mean by an Audio Function Generator? In the hardware world these are usually simply sine/triangle/square wave generators, but the posh ones also do frequency sweeps, and the very

Re: [LAD] audio function generator ?

2010-01-31 Thread Kjetil S. Matheussen
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote: Jens M Andreasen: On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 21:51 +, Victor Lazzarini wrote: ... what do you mean by an Audio Function Generator? I think he means something like this thingie:

[LAD] Anyone testing the new TerminatorX release?

2010-01-31 Thread gerald mwangi
Hi, Has anyone tested TerminatorX 3.83pre? Gerald Hi guys, I'm proud to announce Terminator 3.83pre for testing (http://www.set-germany.org/TerminatorX/terminatorX-3.83pre.tar.gz). Changes: support for rubberband, filehandling exclusively through sndfile, some bugs fixed and i hope none

Re: [LAD] audio function generator ?

2010-01-31 Thread Emanuel Rumpf
2010/1/31 Kjetil S. Matheussen k.s.matheus...@notam02.no: This is an example of a generated function: (- (* (* (/ (/ (/ 713.662104415 445.034158546 ) (- 490.692993367 559.51504981 ) ) (* time 660.128287744 ) ) (% 590.971081136 (* (- 23.1423968616 785.746653358 ) time ) ) ) (/ (/ (* (sin

Re: [LAD] [LAU] audio function generator ?

2010-01-31 Thread Lorenzo
Hi, Maybe this is a little late for your user, but just to add to the record... So, besides the one (with GUI) for the Mac, is there anything else recommended ? The advice for Csound et alia is good, but the asker doesn't know any audio programming languages. Pure Data:

Re: [LAD] Anyone testing the new TerminatorX release?

2010-01-31 Thread Dave Phillips
gerald mwangi wrote: Has anyone tested TerminatorX 3.83pre? Hi Gerald, I tried to build it on an Ubuntu Jaunty system, 32-bit. The configure script ran without complaint, but make produced this error : dlph...@the3800:~/src/terminatorX-3.83pre$ make make all-recursive make[1]: Entering

Re: [LAD] Anyone testing the new TerminatorX release?

2010-01-31 Thread Jostein Chr. Andersen
söndag januari 31 2010 22.42.47 skrev Dave Phillips: /bin/bash: ../depcomp: No such file or directory .. Any suggestions ? Several suggestions on the 'Net says something like this: ..delete the file misc/missing, and when run automake -a -c . This should create all needed files, including

Re: [LAD] Anyone testing the new TerminatorX release?

2010-01-31 Thread Dave Phillips
Jostein Chr. Andersen wrote: söndag januari 31 2010 22.42.47 skrev Dave Phillips: /bin/bash: ../depcomp: No such file or directory .. Any suggestions ? Several suggestions on the 'Net says something like this: ..delete the file misc/missing, and when run automake -a -c

[LAD] [LAU] VocProc - vocal processing app

2010-01-31 Thread Igor Brkic
Hi to all! First post to this list :) and I will use it to present small project I've been working on. VocProc is a real time JACK application for vocal processing including pitch shifting, automatic pitch correction and vocoder. It is basically the same thing as fons' jretune or Tom's

Re: [LAD] Anyone testing the new TerminatorX release?

2010-01-31 Thread gerald mwangi
Hi, for the timebeing mp3 support is broken is sndfile doesn't actually support it. You'll have to use wav files. What do you mean by It won't connect to Jack? You dont see the Terminator outputin qjackctl? Or you cant connect them? Check the prefs if you've enabled Jack as the output. Gerald On

Re: [LAD] Anyone testing the new TerminatorX release?

2010-01-31 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
gerald mwangi wrote: Hi, for the timebeing mp3 support is broken is sndfile doesn't actually support it. libsndfile has never supported mp3, not even a little. TYhe problem is the patent issue: http://www.mega-nerd.com/libsndfile/FAQ.html#Q020 When the patents expire I'll support MP3.

Re: [LAD] Anyone testing the new TerminatorX release?

2010-01-31 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Dan Mills wrote: At the moment I try libsndfile then if that fails do the pipe, dup2 and execve thing to shovel it through an external decoder, but it is a lot of code that would be better in the library. Patch acceptable once it finally expires? Sure! As long as its LGPL compatible code

Re: [LAD] Anyone testing the new TerminatorX release?

2010-01-31 Thread Dan Mills
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 11:53 +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: Sure! As long as its LGPL compatible code and not your pipe/dup2/execve hack :-). While that is undeniably a hack of the first order, it does hide a certain truth in that a lot of the lossy audio codecs out there have a bit of a

Re: [LAD] Anyone testing the new TerminatorX release?

2010-01-31 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
Dan Mills wrote: In fact the background file converter daemon I am writing at the moment does a fork and exec for every conversion precisely to insulate from possible memory leaks in client libraries used by libsndfile (can you swear that the ogg and flac libraries don't have leaks?), it is

[LAD] Some suggestions/guidelines for the LAA posts

2010-01-31 Thread Ivica Ico Bukvic
Dear fellow LA* members, As some of you may be aware, instead of a static news page, Linuxaudio.org now has a direct LAA feed as its front page. Consequently, I would like to encourage everyone to please put special care in crafting your LAA posts, meaning much more so than those destined for

Re: [LAD] [Consortium] Some suggestions/guidelines for the LAA posts

2010-01-31 Thread Marc-Olivier Barre
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 22:32:43 -0500, Ivica Ico Bukvic i...@vt.edu wrote: Dear fellow LA* members, As some of you may be aware, instead of a static news page, Linuxaudio.org now has a direct LAA feed as its front page. Consequently, I would like to encourage everyone to please put special care