Hi, does anyone know a synth powerfull like zynadd, phasex or
bristol,but in dssi format? I need something I can load into Rosegarden,
since I dont want 10 Standalones running, until ardour, rg and the
synths support LASH, if that ever happens.
I think LASH should be integrated into Jack, to make
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Gerald Mwangi gerald.mwa...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi, does anyone know a synth powerfull like zynadd, phasex or
bristol,but in dssi format? I need something I can load into Rosegarden,
since I dont want 10 Standalones running, until ardour, rg and the
synths support
Hi, this is a part of a previous mail,but with catchier Subject
I think LASH should be integrated into Jack, to make it mandatory for
linux audio apps. The missing LASH support is one of the main issues
disturbing me, when working with linux audio. Now I've said it, ha.
I'm thinking of having
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:48:11AM +0100, Gerald Mwangi wrote:
Hi, this is a part of a previous mail,but with catchier Subject
I think LASH should be integrated into Jack, to make it mandatory for
linux audio apps. The missing LASH support is one of the main issues
disturbing me, when
Hi, maybe you can enlighten me on the alternatives.
It just seems to me that the majority of audio devs, simply don't seem
to care about session management. So my idea is just to force them to.
Gerald
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 13:47 +0300, alex stone wrote:
I disagree with LASH inclusion in jack
If you can finance LASH development by giving jobs to 2-3 dedicated coders -
it might be a good way to force it. Other than that I am not sure.
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Gerald Mwangi gerald.mwa...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi, maybe you can enlighten me on the alternatives.
It just seems to me that
Hi, I've played arround with LASH, and it seems to do what it was ment
for. Hydrogen and Zynadd already support it, and I think Ardour too. So
its not about LASH its self, but about the apps that use it. If I were
to push LASH developement, it wouldn't change anything. I mean to force
audio apps,
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Gerald Mwangi gerald.mwa...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi, I've played arround with LASH, and it seems to do what it was ment
for. Hydrogen and Zynadd already support it, and I think Ardour too. So
its not about LASH its self, but about the apps that use it. If I were
to
On Friday 05 March 2010 11:48:11 Gerald Mwangi wrote:
Hi, this is a part of a previous mail,but with catchier Subject
I think LASH should be integrated into Jack, to make it mandatory for
linux audio apps. The missing LASH support is one of the main issues
disturbing me, when working with
Ah cool, is it already in the current jack release? Too lazy to look.
Gerald
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 12:06 +0100, torbenh wrote:
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:48:11AM +0100, Gerald Mwangi wrote:
Hi, this is a part of a previous mail,but with catchier Subject
I think LASH should be integrated
Ok ok, I'm not always on track. Making music+ Family+ TerminatorX+ PhD
application, there's hardly time to follow the list.
By 'Integrating LASH into jack', I really ment session handling into
jack. Sorry
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 12:51 +0100, Arnold Krille wrote:
On Friday 05 March 2010 11:48:11
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Arnold Krille arn...@arnoldarts.de wrote:
LASH is dead. Session-handling in jack is the future. Thats why there is
currently a big discussion going on about using jacks own ipc for the session
handling of clients.
You might want to read the archives of the last
Hi Chris,
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Chris Cannam wrote:
Does any substantive Linux audio development discussion actually
happen on LAD any more?
Yes. :-)
I've only just discovered (because of your email and another pointer
to the list from LAU) that any of this session management stuff was
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Gabriel M. Beddingfield
gabrb...@gmail.com wrote:
I've only just discovered (because of your email and another pointer
to the list from LAU) that any of this session management stuff was
being discussed on jack-devel.
Well, when you're talking about changes to
All:
Based on some of the recent discussions on LAD and LAU, I
thought it prudent to forward this message from the
Jack-Devel list.
If you wish to continue the discussion on the the Jack
session management API, please do it on the Jack-Devel list.
Scroll down to the very bottom for a URL to
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 4:43 AM, Gerald Mwangi gerald.mwa...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi, does anyone know a synth powerfull like zynadd, phasex or
bristol,but in dssi format? I need something I can load into Rosegarden,
since I dont want 10 Standalones running, until ardour, rg and the
synths support
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 10:16 -0600, Josh Lawrence wrote:
I have no idea why, but I have a warm, fuzzy soft place in my heart
for DSSI plugins. they always seem to just work.
Yes. I know LV2 is supposed to be the future, but I can't see why
forcing a tiny synth plugin to link to half a gig of
On Fri, 5 Mar 2010, Gordon JC Pearce wrote:
Yes. I know LV2 is supposed to be the future, but I can't see why
forcing a tiny synth plugin to link to half a gig of libraries and
include a really really overcomplicated RDF parser is a good idea.
This is 100% B.S. Simple plugins only have to
18 matches
Mail list logo
