I noticed that bristol-0.40.7-7 updated due to the following security
update. What got me curious is what kind of security issue could
running bristol possibly pose?? -- none on it's own, but another rogue
package could exploit this issue ...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638376
On 11/15/10 19:03, Niels Mayer wrote:
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Robin Gareus ro...@gareus.org wrote:
http://gjacktransport.sourceforge.net/ is a tool that provides graphical
control over JACK-transport [1].
IAt some point, either from installing version 0.4 or 0.5, whenever I
browsed
This issue has been patched in the debian source, it was done a few weeks ago
now with a case on sf.net to cover it. The problem relates to a user being able
to reconfigure their own LD_LIBRARY_PATH, get their own version of any of the
library to load pretty easily and then do whatever they want
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Niels Mayer nielsma...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed that bristol-0.40.7-7 updated due to the following security
update. What got me curious is what kind of security issue could
running bristol possibly pose?? -- none on it's own, but another rogue
package could
