Re: [LAD] Another call for brave testers: new Guitarix LADSPA plugins

2011-11-26 Thread Tim E. Real
On November 26, 2011 12:40:01 AM Andreas Degert wrote: > Hi, > > we'd like to ask those who are interested in the new Guitarix LADSPA > plugins to run them on their systems and give us some feedback. They > do fine on our own machines and seem to be fit for wider testing. > > The plugins "Guitari

Re: [LAD] Pipes vs. Message Queues

2011-11-26 Thread Nick Copeland
> On my computer, sockets are sometimes slower than both pipes and queues. > > However, by making sure the two processes doesn't change CPU during > runtime, sockets are always the fastest, and I get consistent results: That is useful. How consistent are the results people are getting though? Wh

Re: [LAD] Pipes vs. Message Queues

2011-11-26 Thread Kjetil Matheussen
David Robillard: > On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 15:21 +0100, Nick Copeland wrote: > [...] >> >> So if the pipe() is replaced with >> >> socketpair(PF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, PF_UNSPEC, pipe_fd); >> >> Then the issue I was seeing goes away. Perhaps the pipe() code has not >> been >> optimised since sockets