On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Jörn Nettingsmeier <
netti...@stackingdwarves.net> wrote:
>
> the problem is, you usually have a mixture of the above. hence, no way to
> get the stereo panner right. unless the user knows exactly what s/he is
> doing, and then s/he doesn't really need a stereo pan
On 03/14/2013 12:37 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Jörn Nettingsmeier
mailto:netti...@stackingdwarves.net>> wrote:
On 03/12/2013 08:08 PM, Tim E. Real wrote:
But having said that, yes I'm wondering about a true 'stereo
pan' feature.
How woul
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Jörn Nettingsmeier <
netti...@stackingdwarves.net> wrote:
> On 03/12/2013 08:08 PM, Tim E. Real wrote:
>
> But having said that, yes I'm wondering about a true 'stereo pan' feature.
>> How would such a feature work?
>>
>
> there is no one true stereo pan.
>
> a pa
On 03/12/2013 08:08 PM, Tim E. Real wrote:
But having said that, yes I'm wondering about a true 'stereo pan' feature.
How would such a feature work?
there is no one true stereo pan.
a pan law for intensity stereo (i.e. a panned image or an XY coincident
microphone pair) would increase one ch
Hi,
Some of you might be interested in my new project. It's been a few years
in the making
http://channellinux.com
We have big plans for this new project. Please let me know if you come
across anything that you think would be interesting for the viewing
audience and please link to
