-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30.09.2014 15:58, Harry van Haaren wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpagev=ldhHkVjLe7A#t=1625
To bring this discussion to a productive start, I'd like to
concider the tools we have available as the linux-audio
Hi all,
There's a lot of interesting points brought up: I've only just had the
time to read them, and reply to the points that most speak to me (the
individual) and me (as OpenAV).
Charles Henry wrote:
There does not currently exist a company that is credibly making a complete,
whole-system
On Wednesday 01 October 2014 01:04:52 hermann meyer did opine
And Gene did reply:
Am 30.09.2014 23:51, schrieb Paul Davis:
it isn't about being a professional or not. You can be a professional
woodworker or a weekend amateur and use (functionally speaking) the
same tools. The pro might also
On tal, 2014-09-30 at 10:56 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Harry van Haaren
harryhaa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Linux Audio Developers,
TL;DR; Discussing experience driven design for linux audio.
I'd
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Joël Krähemann weedli...@gmail.com wrote:
Why doesn't Harry learn howto do a dial. I just take a look at his code
and it just sucks.
Hi Joel,
The topic isn't the quality of my code: I'm sorry to hear you feel it
just sucks. If you wish to discuss the quality of
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Florian Paul Schmidt mista.ta...@gmx.net
wrote:
The important point was though that left to their own devices the
non-enthusiasts will be slaughtered by the software they use and maybe
we have a responsibility to protect them from themselves.
slaughter is
Discussion often focuses on thinking for the user or about users that
don't want to learn.
I don't think that this is what the guy in the video was talking about. And
this is certainly not what I mean when talking about usability of Linux
software.
Experience-driven design, as I understood him,
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Louigi Verona louigi.ver...@gmail.com
wrote:
There is a huge difference between having options in a text file that you
have to edit or having them in a GUI. And the difference is not in having
to learn - most users know how to edit a text file. The difference
On Thu, October 2, 2014 1:01 am, Louigi Verona wrote:
Discussion often focuses on thinking for the user or about users that
don't want to learn.
I don't think that this is what the guy in the video was talking about.
And
this is certainly not what I mean when talking about usability of
On Wed, October 1, 2014 17:40, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
Usability usually requires a designers eye. Most good UX designers spend
almost all their time on design/usability issues.
That might be true but UX isn't restricted to visual aspects IMO.
Looking at a button to indicate two statuses, is
Hey Paul,
I agree with most of what you say, you are correct in pointing out that the
situation is more nuanced.
until you need to use a delay to compensate for a block size delay that
you known in samples :)
Wanted to comment on this. Right. You might want to do that. But, as I
said, the price
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 07:01:54PM +0400, Louigi Verona wrote:
How many times in your life have you needed to set delay time to
like 123.7863218 ms or other weird time?
The many times I've had to set a delay time the most convenient
unit could have been samples, millisecs or meters (at the
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 11:32:47AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
it doesn't have to mean that, but it often does, especially if the program
has a lot of options - people get scared of presenting them all and so they
hide most of them.
Exactly. Good example is Chromium's settings page. It shows
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Fons Adriaensen f...@linuxaudio.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 11:32:47AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
it doesn't have to mean that, but it often does, especially if the
program
has a lot of options - people get scared of presenting them all and so
they
On arb, 2014-10-01 at 12:39 +0100, Harry van Haaren wrote:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Joël Krähemann weedli...@gmail.com wrote:
Why doesn't Harry learn howto do a dial. I just take a look at his code
and it just sucks.
Hi Joel,
The topic isn't the quality of my code: I'm sorry to
On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, Louigi Verona wrote:
Also, I would like to say this - bottom line is that most apps on Linux are not
known
for ease of use. And that has a systematic cause, no doubt about it. In my view
the
cause is that this is mostly software done for oneself rather than for the
Here's an interesting counterpoint or follow up point or whatever. I've
queued it to start at the right time, listen till about 31:00 (or longer if
you want). The key point I wanted to highlight was Gerhard's point about
saying No to user requests. But, being Gerhard, he has other interesting
bah. bad formatting. try this:
http://www.dailymotion.com/embed/video/x26axz5?start=1530
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
On Wed, 1 Oct 2014, Paul Davis wrote:
Here's an interesting counterpoint or follow up point or whatever. I've queued
it to
start at the right time, listen till about 31:00 (or longer if you want). The
key point
I wanted to highlight was Gerhard's point about saying No to user requests.
But,
The Guitarix developers proudly present
Guitarix release 0.31.0
For the uninitiated, Guitarix is a tube amplifier simulation for
jack (Linux), with an additional mono and a stereo effect rack.
Guitarix includes a large list of plugins[*] and support LADSPA / LV2
plugs as well.
The guitarix
20 matches
Mail list logo
