Re: [LAD] RME madi latency

2016-02-03 Thread Fokke de Jong
Hi Adrian, I could’ve guessed you were on this list as well :-) I’m going to try this tomorrow when back in the studio, or maybe I can even do it remote if I have left everything patched up correctly :-) I will come back with the results. Thanks for your input! fokke > On Feb 3, 2016, at

Re: [LAD] [LAU] LAC is dead! Long live miniLAC!

2016-02-03 Thread Louigi Verona
Hello David! Thank you very much for your announcement! Because for many people it means arranging transport and housing, can you say how certain these plans are? For instance, I see no announcement on c-base website anywhere about this. I know organizing is a super tough thing, just want to

Re: [LAD] RME madi latency

2016-02-03 Thread Markus Seeber
On 02/03/2016 03:40 PM, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: > On 02/03/2016 02:54 PM, Fokke de Jong wrote: >> Hi Adrian, >> >> I could’ve guessed you were on this list as well :-) >> I’m going to try this tomorrow when back in the studio, or maybe I can >> even do it remote if I have left everything

Re: [LAD] RME madi latency

2016-02-03 Thread Adrian Knoth
On 02/03/16 14:04, Fokke de Jong wrote: Hi all, Hi! I have a RME madi fx card, but i found out that the minimal buffersize for those cards is 8192 samples, which is way to big for my use. Hardware buffer size. This buffer is divided into sub-buffers (periods) depending on what you

Re: [LAD] RME madi latency

2016-02-03 Thread Jörn Nettingsmeier
On 02/03/2016 02:54 PM, Fokke de Jong wrote: Hi Adrian, I could’ve guessed you were on this list as well :-) I’m going to try this tomorrow when back in the studio, or maybe I can even do it remote if I have left everything patched up correctly :-) I will come back with the results. Thanks

[LAD] RME madi latency

2016-02-03 Thread Fokke de Jong
Hi all, I have a RME madi fx card, but i found out that the minimal buffersize for those cards is 8192 samples, which is way to big for my use. So i am thinking of returning the card, and getting the ‘normal’ rme madi (without the fx). As that seems to have a more sensible minimal buffersize of

Re: [LAD] [LAU] LAC is dead! Long live miniLAC!

2016-02-03 Thread David Runge
Hey Louigi, yes, this is a legit invitation, otherwise I wouldn't want to send this out! :-) c-base has this in its calendar (still titled "LAC16") and slightly shifted date (time hole issues): https://www.c-base.org/cal/month.php?cal=regular,seminare,termine=20160401 There are plenty of events

[LAD] LAC is dead! Long live miniLAC!

2016-02-03 Thread David Runge
Hello Linux Audio Community! This is the announcement you have been waiting for. We've come to the conclusion that doing a full LAC at the announced date is impossible, as our sponsoring setup didn't work out, therefore we have decided to go ahead with a miniLAC instead. Since we have already