On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Louigi Verona
wrote:
> Paul, not to derail the conversation, but can you give us a little detail
> on what kind of problems happen in scenarios outside of the desktop
> environment? I am just curious.
>
building and installing JACK was hard.
making it work with t
Paul, not to derail the conversation, but can you give us a little detail
on what kind of problems happen in scenarios outside of the desktop
environment? I am just curious.
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Markus Seeber <
markus.see...@spectralbird.de> wrote:
> On 09/23/2016 05:13 PM, Paul Davis
On 09/23/2016 05:13 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
> The last time I was working with such a person was deeply illustrative: a
> small technology company doing audio on raspberry pi and beagle boards.
> Using JACK. Having an insanely hard time even getting it work. Even with me
> sitting in with them. Their
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Patrick Shirkey <
pshir...@boosthardware.com> wrote:
>
> > Because we've done a fucking piss-poor job of licensing, packaging and
> > promoting technology in ways that make sense to the overwhelming majority
> > of developers and users.
> >
>
> If this is correct
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:50 AM, Patrick Shirkey <
> pshir...@boosthardware.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> > On 09/22/2016 07:30 PM, Tito Latini wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 09:16:12AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
>> >> [...]
>> >>> > Ableton have now done that, albeit by circumventing the hardest
>>
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Patrick Shirkey <
pshir...@boosthardware.com> wrote:
>
>
> One can draw reasonable conclusions based on the evidence at hand.
>
You don't have any evidence other than the absence of evidence.
>
> >
> > How many times is it necessary for someone to explain that
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 6:00 AM, Patrick Shirkey
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> I suppose that their marketing department has decided that Linux
>> Developers/Users don't represent a big enough share of the market to
>> justify committing more resources to the platform.
>>
>
> You have no idea what their ma
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Paul Davis
wrote:
>
>
> There are no fields I know of where open source leads in terms of end-user
> visible software applications.
>
oops. except for web browsers.
>
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@l
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 6:00 AM, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
>
> I suppose that their marketing department has decided that Linux
> Developers/Users don't represent a big enough share of the market to
> justify committing more resources to the platform.
>
You have no idea what their marketing departm
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 12:50 AM, Patrick Shirkey <
pshir...@boosthardware.com> wrote:
>
> > On 09/22/2016 07:30 PM, Tito Latini wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 09:16:12AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>> > Ableton have now done that, albeit by circumventing the hardest parts
> >>> of
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Tito Latini wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 04:36:17PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Tito Latini
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:49:42PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> > > > The innovation is defining an API and protocol
"IMO anyone who doesn't know about JACK and claims to be a professional
audio developer has dubious credentials."
I think this is an unfounded statement. Many professional audio developers
work on Windows with ASIO
and are both professional and some of them definitely unaware of JACK.
"Keep in mi
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 13:00:08 +0200, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
>> On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 19:58 +0200, Robin Gareus wrote:
>>> That's pretty cool IMHO and I wish more companies would do that!
>>>
>>> Also coming up with a protocol is the easier part. Documenting it,
>>> pushing it out to users, gaini
> On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 19:58 +0200, Robin Gareus wrote:
>> That's pretty cool IMHO and I wish more companies would do that!
>>
>> Also coming up with a protocol is the easier part. Documenting it,
>> pushing it out to users, gaining traction in the industry etc is the
>> hard part.
>
> I agree wi
On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 19:58 +0200, Robin Gareus wrote:
> That's pretty cool IMHO and I wish more companies would do that!
>
> Also coming up with a protocol is the easier part. Documenting it,
> pushing it out to users, gaining traction in the industry etc is the
> hard part.
I agree with this. T
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 04:36:17PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Tito Latini wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:49:42PM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> > > The innovation is defining an API and protocol based on 3 concepts:
> > >
> > > tempo synchronization
> >
>
16 matches
Mail list logo
