On Sun, 17 Mar 2019 20:12:04 +0100
Robin Gareus wrote:
>On 3/17/19 5:56 PM, Jonathan Brickman wrote:
>> That is likely to change depending on GCC optimization setting, no?
>
>Not usually. It depends on the target architecture more than anything.
>
>Even with -O0, gcc translates integer addition
On 3/17/19 5:56 PM, Jonathan Brickman wrote:
> That is likely to change depending on GCC optimization setting, no?
Not usually. It depends on the target architecture more than anything.
Even with -O0, gcc translates integer addition and multiplications into
a combination of bitwise and arithmetic
On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 11:56:40AM -0500, Jonathan Brickman wrote:
> That is likely to change depending on GCC optimization setting, no?
>
This is why you can't trust very high level languages like C, and should
be wary of high-level languages like assembler.
--
Gordonjcp
__
J.E.B:
> That is likely to change depending on GCC optimization setting, no?
Then, why don't you just test it to find out, you have the means to
that after all.
Regards,
/Karl Hammar
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org
That is likely to change depending on GCC optimization setting, no?
J.E.B.
On Sat, Mar 16, 2019, 5:12 PM wrote:
> Will Godfrey:
> > On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:09:17 +0100 (CET)
> > k...@aspodata.se wrote:
> >
> > >Will Godfrey:
> > >> Does anyone know if GCC will replace power of 2
> multiplication
