Re: [LAD] Simple Pipewire test request

2021-07-08 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On 7/8/21 11:29 AM, John Murphy wrote: On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 08:56:56 -0700 Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: On 7/7/21 11:24 AM, John Murphy wrote: On Wed, 7 Jul 2021 19:01:25 +0100 Keith Edmunds wrote: Try: /usr/bin/pw-record /home/john/crontest.wav > /tmp/cronjob.txt 2>&1 ...and h

Re: [LAD] Simple Pipewire test request

2021-07-08 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On 7/7/21 11:24 AM, John Murphy wrote: On Wed, 7 Jul 2021 19:01:25 +0100 Keith Edmunds wrote: Try: /usr/bin/pw-record /home/john/crontest.wav > /tmp/cronjob.txt 2>&1 ...and have a look in /tmp/cronjob.txt after it's run /tmp/cronjob.txt says error: pw_context_connect() failed: Host is down

Re: [LAD] Is Piperware a successor to Jack/Pulseaudio?

2021-07-07 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On 7/7/21 9:59 AM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: On 7/7/21 4:00 AM, Wim Taymans wrote: ... == install patched rtkit in which priorities and cpu usage limits have been changed to more audio dsp friendly values < NOTE: max realtime priorities in rtkit are hardwired (in the source c

Re: [LAD] Is Piperware a successor to Jack/Pulseaudio?

2021-07-07 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On 7/7/21 4:00 AM, Wim Taymans wrote: On Tue, 6 Jul 2021 at 21:41, Fons Adriaensen wrote: I'll give PW its chance when the developers tell me it's ready for real life. Which will mean a session with around 15 jack clients with a total of 800 or so ports. Should run without hickups while

Re: [LAD] Is Piperware a successor to Jack/Pulseaudio?

2021-07-06 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On 7/6/21 12:41 PM, Fons Adriaensen wrote: On Tue, Jul 06, 2021 at 12:37:55PM +0100, Will Godfrey wrote: At one time you added things that you wanted. These days you have to remove what you don't want - but might not even know was there until it interferes with what you want to do. This is

Re: [LAD] Is Piperware a successor to Jack/Pulseaudio?

2021-07-06 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On 7/4/21 6:25 PM, Robin Gareus wrote: On 7/4/21 6:35 PM, John Murphy wrote: On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 15:48:31 -0700 Yuri wrote: [...] Does anybody have experience using it? https://pipewire.org/ Yes. I've used it for a whole day now, on Linux Mint 20.1 Ulyssa base (Ubuntu 20.04 focal).

[LAD] job opportunity at CCRMA

2021-06-24 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
Hi all, CCRMA (the Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics, Stanford University) is looking for a new team member! Read more below, and follow the link for the full job posting... Best, & stay safe, -- Fernando CCRMA is seeking a Systems Administrator. The Systems Administrator

Re: [LAD] B.Spacr - New LV2 sound effect plugin

2021-04-01 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On 4/1/21 1:15 AM, Fons Adriaensen wrote: On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 10:00:43AM +0200, Jeremy Jongepier wrote: Hear hear! Awesome plugin, this is going to be an always on plugin! Hats off for the code also, I've rarely seen such clean, concise code. Since the code is so clean, I was able to

[LAD] job opportunity at CCRMA (take 2)

2015-08-12 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
Hi all, The Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics (CCRMA) at Stanford University is a multi-disciplinary facility where composers and researchers work together using computer-based technology both as an artistic medium and as a research tool (https://ccrma.stanford.edu/about).

Re: [LAD] AVB not so dead after all

2015-06-08 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On 06/07/2015 07:15 AM, Len Ovens wrote: ... Why is this? Linux is based on lowest common denominator hardware... we call it the PC. The Linux world has gotten much better preformance out of this box than it was designed for. But, in the case of audio, the HW does limit performance at least with

Re: [LAD] ambix vs JUCE, segfault

2015-04-13 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
:42 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano na...@ccrma.stanford.edu mailto:na...@ccrma.stanford.edu wrote: On 04/13/2015 11:24 AM, Paul Davis wrote: definitely caused by use of X / GUI toolkit calls from the wrong thread. Not legal. Ok, thanks, staring at code - no idea what

Re: [LAD] ambix vs JUCE, segfault

2015-04-13 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
) the GUI starts fine but it can randomly crash with the same message. Race condition that is sometimes triggered? Anyone our there running the Ambix LV2 plugins successfully? (in, for example, Ardour3?) -- Fernando On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano na

Re: [LAD] ambix vs JUCE, segfault

2015-04-13 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On 04/13/2015 07:13 AM, Tito Latini wrote: On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 07:29:41PM -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: Anyone out there using ambix on Linux? I'm seeing various instabilities, for example trying out the converter standalone I get a segfault when connecting output ports

[LAD] ambix vs JUCE, segfault

2015-04-12 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
Anyone out there using ambix on Linux? I'm seeing various instabilities, for example trying out the converter standalone I get a segfault when connecting output ports, and it looks like the Jack JUCE component is doing some unaligned memory copies. Any hint on how to fix this? I get Ardour

[LAD] SysV init scripts vs. systemd, a short note

2013-03-19 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
Hi all, Hopefully this will be useful to others. I just wrote a short note describing my experiences when moving from a SysV init script based OpenMixer[*] system to one that uses systemd. In short, yes, it is possible, no, it was not easy (mostly because of my own ignorance of systemd, of

[LAD] IR: LV2 Convolution Reverb and ambisonics

2012-05-12 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On 01/13/2011 10:37 AM, Tom Szilagyi wrote: Hi all, Standing on the shoulders of giants[*], I am pleased to announce the public release of IR, a convolution reverb in the LV2 plugin format. Released as free software under the GNU GPL, this easy to use plugin has been created to open the

Re: [LAD] Ambisonic Effect processing

2012-01-10 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On 01/10/2012 04:07 PM, Harry van Haaren wrote: Hi everyone, I'm currently thinking about how to process B-format ambisonic signals. For basic compression, gating, expanding, limiting etc things are relatively simple: process all 4 of the W,X,Y and Z signals. But what bout effects like Reverb:

Re: [LAD] LAC 2012: the Linux Audio Conference - Call for Participation

2011-10-21 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On 10/21/2011 06:10 AM, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: hey fernando, this: http://lac.linuxaudio.org/2012/img/lac2012.png is utterly charming :-D That was done by Robin Gareus and I certainly __love__ it! I did not even get to thinking about the logo and suddenly it was there already! thanks

[LAD] LAC 2012: the Linux Audio Conference - Call for Participation

2011-10-20 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
LAC 2012: the Linux Audio Conference - Call for Participation April 12-15, 2012 @ CCRMA, Stanford University http://lac.linuxaudio.org/2012/ [Apologies for cross-postings] [Please distribute] Online submission of papers, music, installations and workshops is now open! On the website you will

Re: [LAD] Any package builders here?

2011-06-01 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On 06/01/2011 02:50 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: Hi :) could you please add a dependency to audio/MIDI app packages for your distros, that will set up real-time usage? The following issue is wide spread: Forwarded Message Be sure you are able to run audio apps

Re: [LAD] ALSA multi plugin and JACK xrun callbacks

2011-01-14 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On 01/14/2011 02:12 PM, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: On 01/14/2011 10:39 PM, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: i had it crash once when loading a really demanding session, but with another average ardour project, it has now played fine and without glitches for 10 minutes or so, while the xrun count goes

Re: [LAD] Some new things to play with

2010-10-11 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On 10/11/2010 07:35 AM, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote: On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 03:47:43PM +0200, Robin Gareus wrote: The commonly used target (autotools) is make uninstall (not make remove) But I don't use autotools :-). It's easy to provide both. It is just a common idiom and would be good to

Re: [LAD] what does full range mean with regard to ambisonics and speakers?

2010-08-04 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 21:38 +0200, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote: On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 08:17:03PM +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: sending high-passed WXYZ and full-range higher orders to the tops won't work well, i guess. if you want to take care of the band-splitting in your mixer, your

Re: [LAD] what does full range mean with regard to ambisonics and speakers?

2010-08-04 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 15:32 +0200, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote: On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 11:11:28PM -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: That would be great... right now I'm using a HPF/LPF pair for my tests (butterworth 12dB/oct, supercollider) and placing them high enough that, well

Re: [LAD] what does full range mean with regard to ambisonics and speakers?

2010-08-03 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Sun, 2010-08-01 at 13:39 +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: On 07/31/2010 11:14 PM, Bearcat M. Şandor wrote: I am planning on subs that have their own low-pass filters. I have a pair of Anthony Gallo Reference 3.1s but for this ambisonics set up, i'd get 4 pairs of the Anthony Gallo

Re: [LAD] what does full range mean with regard to ambisonics and speakers?

2010-08-03 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 20:17 +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: On 08/03/2010 07:45 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: Hmmm, so, you send WXYZ to the four subs and whatever order you can decode to the regular speakers (6, 8, etc). Sounds good. it does :) except you'd usually throw away z

Re: [LAD] Attenuation of sounds in 3D space

2010-07-29 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 16:14 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 17:01 +0200, JohnLM wrote: On 2010.07.29. 15:20, Gene Heskett wrote: On Thursday, July 29, 2010 08:52:04 am Jörn Nettingsmeier did opine: john, On 07/29/2010 02:35 PM, JohnLM wrote: So from what I can

Re: [LAD] Attenuation of sounds in 3D space

2010-07-23 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 08:51 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 01:09 +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: On 07/22/2010 08:42 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: one thing that often gets overlooked: people have learned to accept stereo (or, in some circles, 5.1) as the gold standard, and

Re: [LAD] Attenuation of sounds in 3D space

2010-07-22 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 14:01 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 01:04 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote: We are not talking about 5.1 or 7.1 here. These suck big time. We are talking about ambisonics vs. binaurals vs. simple stereo here! Ok, I noticed this. Fon's AmbDec is the

Re: [LAD] Attenuation of sounds in 3D space

2010-07-22 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 20:22 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 10:52 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 14:01 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 01:04 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote: We are not talking about 5.1 or 7.1 here. These suck big

Re: [LAD] Attenuation of sounds in 3D space

2010-07-21 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 01:08 +0200, Arnold Krille wrote: On Wednesday 21 July 2010 23:27:59 Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 23:21 +0200, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote: And you fail regarding almost everything you write. If you want to pontificate about acoustics and psycho-acoustics

Re: [LAD] remember ??

2010-06-23 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 22:12 +0200, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote: Hello all, those of you who attended LAC2009 will recognise the Sala Bianca and lovely metal girl Giorgia: http://www.youtube.com/user/WinterHaze01 Enjoy ! :-) Wow... All the monitoring was done with WFS virtual speakers?

Re: [LAD] qjackctl server name

2010-06-15 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 22:37 +0200, f...@kokkinizita.net wrote: On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 09:26:16PM +0100, Rui Nuno Capela wrote: but in a normal desktop environment they should not stack up, the one just replaces the one before, which stays there for 3 seconds maximum. They don't stack up,

[LAD] digiface vs. multiface vs. jack vs. other cards

2010-03-29 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
At CCRMA we have several studios with linux computers in them (in addition to computers sprinkled throughout the building). Some of the studios have digiface interfaces, some multiface. All of them are connected to the sound system or mixer digitally through adat lightpipes. Workstations have

Re: [LAD] [alsa-devel] 2.6.31.x vs. rme vs. alsa 1.0.22?

2010-02-23 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 00:20 +, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 00:16 +, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 23:51 +, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 17:58 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: Hey, has anyone been seeing

Re: [LAD] 2.6.31.x vs. rme vs. alsa 1.0.22?

2010-02-22 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 00:25 +0100, Florian Faber wrote: James, could it be the PCMCIA part ? I have the PCI version and both 2.6.31.x and 2.6.32 are working as they should with my RME HDSP and Multiface II. It's pretty much a regression in the ALSA control part. Unfortunately I don't

Re: [LAD] [alsa-devel] 2.6.31.x vs. rme vs. alsa 1.0.22?

2010-02-22 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 17:58 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: Hey, has anyone been seeing strange behavior from this combination? kernel 2.6.31.x rt20 + alsa 1.0.22 userland RME card (pcmcia card + multiface) hdspmixer is not doing the right thing (does not initialize the card

Re: [LAD] [alsa-devel] 2.6.31.x vs. rme vs. alsa 1.0.22?

2010-02-22 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 23:51 +, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 17:58 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: Hey, has anyone been seeing strange behavior from this combination? kernel 2.6.31.x rt20 + alsa 1.0.22 userland RME card (pcmcia card + multiface

Re: [LAD] [alsa-devel] 2.6.31.x vs. rme vs. alsa 1.0.22?

2010-02-22 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 23:51 +, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 17:58 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: Hey, has anyone been seeing strange behavior from this combination? kernel 2.6.31.x rt20 + alsa 1.0.22 userland RME card (pcmcia card + multiface

Re: [LAD] [alsa-devel] 2.6.31.x vs. rme vs. alsa 1.0.22?

2010-02-22 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 00:16 +, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: On Mon, 2010-02-22 at 23:51 +, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 17:58 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: Hey, has anyone been seeing strange behavior from this combination? kernel 2.6.31.x rt20

Re: [LAD] 2.6.31.x vs. rme vs. alsa 1.0.22?

2010-02-17 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 06:30 +0100, Raphaël Doursenaud wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 17/02/2010 02:58, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano a écrit : Hey, has anyone been seeing strange behavior from this combination? kernel 2.6.31.x rt20 + alsa 1.0.22 userland RME

[LAD] 2.6.31.x vs. rme vs. alsa 1.0.22?

2010-02-16 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
Hey, has anyone been seeing strange behavior from this combination? kernel 2.6.31.x rt20 + alsa 1.0.22 userland RME card (pcmcia card + multiface) hdspmixer is not doing the right thing (does not initialize the card in a way in which playback works), it does not see the hwdep interface (or

Re: [LAD] Has anyone ever played a plugin in realtime ... [related to:] hard realtime performance synth

2010-02-10 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 20:30 +0100, Emanuel Rumpf wrote: 2010/2/4 Arnold Krille arn...@arnoldarts.de: On Thursday 04 February 2010 18:50:28 Emanuel Rumpf wrote: Has anyone ever played a plugin in realtime ( live )... ...and I don't mean a one-finger melody, but a mutli-polyphonic piano

Re: [LAD] LinuxSampler 1.0.0 released for Linux, Windows, OS X

2009-11-12 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 14:45 +0200, Benno Senoner wrote: Hi all, the LinuxSampler team is proud to announce LinuxSampler 1.0.0, with many new features and modules, device drivers and plugin architectures supported. Hi all... has anyone else seen problems with 1.0.0 and pitch bend? It would

Re: [LAD] LinuxSampler 1.0.0 released for Linux, Windows, OS X

2009-11-12 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 12:59 -0600, Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote: On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: Hi all... has anyone else seen problems with 1.0.0 and pitch bend? It would seem that it is broken in my builds (ie: no pitch bend response at all from linuxsampler

Re: [LAD] rme hdspe raydat on linux?

2009-10-15 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 18:19 +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: hi everyone! is the rme hdspe raydat supported under linux? if so, any raydat users here with success or horror stories? if not, is there an alternative that has at least 3 adat i/o, preferrably 4 and uses pci express? i know

Re: [LAD] more ConsoleKit

2009-07-14 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 01:15 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote: On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 01:06:18AM +0200, Bengt Gördén wrote: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/30/52 All I get is some XML related warnings and errors... Same here, you need cookies or something like that enabled... Long discussion

[LAD] wrapper script (hack alert!) for jack + pulseaudio

2009-07-14 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
Well, I could not find one so I wrote this simple perl jackd wrapper script[*], I really needed something that would enable jack and pulseaudio to coexist while the jack + pulseaudio situation stabilizes. Not a finished product but seems to work around here (tested lightly on Fedora 10). If you

Re: [LAD] [ANNOUNCE] Safe real-time on the desktop by default; Desktop/audio RT developers, read this!

2009-06-25 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 17:25 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 18:44 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcanona...@ccrma.stanford.edu wrote: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10361 (referenced inside

Re: [LAD] [ANNOUNCE] Safe real-time on the desktop by default; Desktop/audio RT developers, read this!

2009-06-23 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 08:46 -0400, Dave Phillips wrote: Patrick Shirkey wrote: What I see is that Lennart and the others who have worked on pulseaudio have done such a good job at making the platform accessible to the desktop community that it has now become the defacto standard for

Re: [LAD] [ANNOUNCE] Safe real-time on the desktop by default; Desktop/audio RT developers, read this!

2009-06-23 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 10:44 +0200, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mon, 22.06.09 23:46, Jörn Nettingsmeier (netti...@folkwang-hochschule.de) wrote: What is so difficult to understand that rtkit is not intended to be a solution for hardcore rt users? rtkit

Re: [LAD] [ANNOUNCE] Safe real-time on the desktop by default; Desktop/audio RT developers, read this!

2009-06-23 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 13:12 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: 2009/6/23 Fernando Lopez-Lezcano na...@ccrma.stanford.edu: [ ... good attempt at a summary elided ... ] fernando, unfortunately, you still missed the mechanisms described here: http://ww2.cs.fsu.edu/~rosentha/linux/2.6.26.5/docs

Re: [LAD] [ANNOUNCE] Safe real-time on the desktop by default; Desktop/audio RT developers, read this!

2009-06-23 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 15:27 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcanona...@ccrma.stanford.edu wrote: This is what Lennart wrote in his original announcement: Why not use cgroups for this? Because it's simply a horrible API, and using this for

Re: [LAD] [ANNOUNCE] Safe real-time on the desktop by default; Desktop/audio RT developers, read this!

2009-06-23 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
[something appears to be wrong on the list, I'm not seeing your posts there, I'm just getting the emails directly addressed to me] On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 16:27 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcanona...@ccrma.stanford.edu wrote: On Tue, 2009-06-23 at

Re: [LAD] [ANNOUNCE] Safe real-time on the desktop by default; Desktop/audio RT developers, read this!

2009-06-23 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 18:44 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcanona...@ccrma.stanford.edu wrote: see here for an interesting entry: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442959 that is hilarious :) and

Re: [LAD] [ANNOUNCE] Safe real-time on the desktop by default; Desktop/audio RT developers, read this!

2009-06-23 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 18:44 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcanona...@ccrma.stanford.edu wrote: see here for an interesting entry: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442959 that is hilarious :) Hmmm, well, not really. It means he

Re: [LAD] [ANNOUNCE] Safe real-time on the desktop by default; Desktop/audio RT developers, read this!

2009-06-23 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 15:14 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Sun, 21.06.09 20:58, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano (na...@ccrma.stanford.edu) wrote: The question is relevant, I think, as the kernels that I use (Planet CCRMA) are the rt patched kernels, currently limited to 2.6.29.5 (I

Re: [LAD] [ANNOUNCE] Safe real-time on the desktop by default; Desktop/audio RT developers, read this!

2009-06-23 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 10:33 +0700, Patrick Shirkey wrote: On 06/24/2009 10:24 AM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 18:44 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcanona...@ccrma.stanford.edu wrote: see here

Re: [LAD] [ANNOUNCE] Safe real-time on the desktop by default; Desktop/audio RT developers, read this!

2009-06-23 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 20:25 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 15:14 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Sun, 21.06.09 20:58, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano (na...@ccrma.stanford.edu) wrote: The question is relevant, I think, as the kernels that I use (Planet

Re: [LAD] [ANNOUNCE] Safe real-time on the desktop by default; Desktop/audio RT developers, read this!

2009-06-22 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 17:58 +0100, Krzysztof Foltman wrote: Fons Adriaensen wrote: You're not ignoring it, you're practically waging the war against it, Ever seen a real war ? Your point being? The existence of rtkit doesn't make it harder for you to assign RT privileges to every

Re: [LAD] [ANNOUNCE] Safe real-time on the desktop by default; Desktop/audio RT developers, read this!

2009-06-22 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 20:24 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mon, 22.06.09 11:15, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano (na...@ccrma.stanford.edu) wrote: On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 15:38 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mon, 22.06.09 15:05, Fons Adriaensen (f...@kokkinizita.net) wrote: On Mon, Jun

Re: [LAD] [ANNOUNCE] Safe real-time on the desktop by default; Desktop/audio RT developers, read this!

2009-06-22 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 18:00 -0400, drew Roberts wrote: On Monday 22 June 2009 17:37:20 Lennart Poettering wrote: The amount of constructive criticism in this thread is next to zero, nobody even bothers to read the README before just fudding around. I am one of those who also haven't

Re: [LAD] [ANNOUNCE] Safe real-time on the desktop by default; Desktop/audio RT developers, read this!

2009-06-22 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 14:18 -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 22:04 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mon, 22.06.09 12:51, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano (na...@ccrma.stanford.edu) wrote: Good question. Why is it resetting all the default, even processes

Re: [LAD] [ANNOUNCE] Safe real-time on the desktop by default; Desktop/audio RT developers, read this!

2009-06-22 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 20:22 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Lennart Poetteringmz...@0pointer.de wrote: You are misunderstanding what I was saying: either a process is SCHED_RR/FIFO or it is not. That's a binary thing. Either you get the full RT powers, or no RT

Re: [LAD] [ANNOUNCE] Safe real-time on the desktop by default; Desktop/audio RT developers, read this!

2009-06-21 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 20:13 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: Heya, Just a quick announcement: I just moved into Fedora Rawhide a little daemon called RealtimeKit which will be enabled by default, and since it is now a dependency of PulseAudio and things work how they work this will then

Re: [LAD] [ANNOUNCE] Safe real-time on the desktop by default; Desktop/audio RT developers, read this!

2009-06-21 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 20:13 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: Heya, Just a quick announcement: I just moved into Fedora Rawhide a little daemon called RealtimeKit which will be enabled by default, and since it is now a dependency of PulseAudio and things work how they work this will then

Re: [LAD] [ANNOUNCE] Safe real-time on the desktop by default; Desktop/audio RT developers, read this!

2009-06-21 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 00:15 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Sun, 21.06.09 11:09, Paul Davis (p...@linuxaudiosystems.com) wrote: I cannot imagine wanting to use this mechanism. You also seem to have assumed that everyone agrees that SCHED_RR is the correct policy, rather than SCHED_FIFO.

Re: [LAD] [ANNOUNCE] Safe real-time on the desktop by default; Desktop/audio RT developers, read this!

2009-06-21 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Sun, 2009-06-21 at 19:14 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcanona...@ccrma.stanford.edu wrote: If I understand correctly then the mechanism would not be useful for jack (leaving aside the issue of SCHED_RR vs. SCHED_FIFO), as jack actually

Re: [LAD] [ANNOUNCE] Safe real-time on the desktop by default; Desktop/audio RT developers, read this!

2009-06-21 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 01:55 +0100, Adam Sampson wrote: Lennart Poettering mz...@0pointer.de writes: I just moved into Fedora Rawhide a little daemon called RealtimeKit which will be enabled by default, It would have been nice to see some mention of this on l-a-u/l-a-d earlier (i.e.

Re: [LAD] jack2's dbus name

2009-06-15 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 16:37 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mon, 15.06.09 15:34, Stéphane Letz (l...@grame.fr) wrote: On Mon, 15.06.09 11:01, Stéphane Letz (l...@grame.fr) wrote: I was just thinking, when jack2 finished initialization it takes a name on the session bus, right?

Re: [LAD] jack2's dbus name

2009-06-15 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
[it'd be nice if you keep all the cc'ed original lists in the thread] On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 19:34 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mon, 15.06.09 10:16, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano (na...@ccrma.stanford.edu) wrote: Distributions will certainly enable the D-Bus code in JACK if they ship

Re: [LAD] [Jack-Devel] more jack/qjackctl madness

2009-05-24 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 13:11 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote: On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:20:34PM +0200, MarcO'Chapeau wrote: - dbus is not the default compile time config option. Your distro should probably disable it (until it's stable and shiny) On this I agree. (sorry for the delay, I

Re: [LAD] alsa card order

2009-05-04 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 17:55 +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote: On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 07:45:31AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote: On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Fons Adriaensen f...@kokkinizita.net wrote: How do you start jackd on an alsa hw device without knowing the index (in a

Re: [LAD] alsa card order

2009-05-04 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 22:05 -0400, Lee Revell wrote: On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Lennart Poettering mz...@0pointer.de wrote: Doing these things with indexes is just broken. It's like network interfaces. Everybody learned to use names for them instead of the low-level ifindex. Now it's

Re: [LAD] audio recording through pipe using mplayer and sox sometimes has incorrect speed

2009-04-18 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 14:34 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Justin Smith noisesm...@gmail.com wrote: Off the top of my head, something could be put together with a shell script using the jack_connect program. If you are OK with a single purpose script that runs and

Re: [LAD] Re : Saving plugin presets

2009-03-08 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 02:07 +0100, Fons Adriaensen wrote: On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 01:34:19AM +0100, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: Stefan Kost wrote: Just wanna say thanks! GStreamers ladspa bridge now has initil lrdf support. Classification works, presets next. I wish Fons's ladspa

Re: [LAD] Re : Saving plugin presets

2009-03-08 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 04:08 +0100, Jens M Andreasen wrote: On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 01:55 +, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: That does not work very well with packages. If I have a package for each of the plugin collections (which I do), where do I put the rdf file? (I think I have

Re: [LAD] [ot] - NEED some security advise PLEASE! + new question

2009-02-16 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Sun, 2009-02-15 at 23:08 +1100, Steve Lindsay wrote: On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 9:57 PM, Fons Adriaensen f...@kokkinizita.net wrote: A weakly related OT question: I need to set up a machine as a router. One side is a fixed public IP address, the other side is a local net using

Re: [LAD] [ot] - NEED some security advise PLEASE!

2009-02-14 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Sun, 2009-02-15 at 01:14 +, pete shorthose wrote: On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 00:43:17 +0100 Fons Adriaensen f...@kokkinizita.net wrote: On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 11:55:13PM +0100, Julien Claassen wrote: 8226 ?Ss 0:00 sshd: unknown [priv] 8227 ?S 0:00 sshd:

Re: [LAD] [FFADO-devel] [ANN] FFADO 2.0 Release Candidate 1 (1.999.40) available

2008-12-11 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 09:29 +0100, Arnold Krille wrote: On Thursday 11 December 2008 03:45:58 Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: Usually programs include something like DESTDIR= to set that directory so that the install can be redirected without compromising all the internal paths and references

Re: [LAD] need help with Java audio problem

2008-08-18 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 02:32 +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote: On Sun, 2008-08-17 at 16:06 -0400, Dave Phillips wrote: ... If Java uses the ALSA device, for some reason it opens pcmC0D0p, then switches to pcmC1D0p. This happens in both HighC and jein, they showed the same behavior. My

Re: [LAD] vectorization

2008-04-17 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 06:41 +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote: On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 22:41 +0200, Mario Lang wrote: You are not really following what I am trying to get across. Cross compilation isn't the issue. The issue is that something as generic as i386 (or i686 for rpm based

Re: [LAD] optimum binary distribution (was: vectorization)

2008-04-17 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 14:00 +0200, Richard Spindler wrote: 2008/4/17, Jens M Andreasen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: You really do that? OK, the solution is identical to choosing the right base architecture in the first place. One of these gets mounted as /usr/lib ---8--- /*/usr/lib/i386

Re: [LAD] vectorization

2008-04-17 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 19:31 +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote: On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 19:02 +0200, Mario Lang wrote: No. If you optimize code, you will only have to special case a few routines. The greater hunk of the code will stay the same on different variants. So you do not want to

Re: [LAD] vectorization

2008-04-17 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 18:36 +0200, Jens M Andreasen wrote: On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 16:14 +0200, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: You mean _complete_ binaries? All of the executable replicated several times with different optimizations inside the package? So your intention is not to optimize

Re: [LAD] alsa and OSS (again?)

2008-01-21 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 07:32 +0100, Albert Graef wrote: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: Or, if from the get go it would have been included in the mainline kernel source (after submitting it to the proper channels, etc, etc - difficult but not impossible. Out of mainline kernel drivers have

Re: [LAD] alsa and OSS (again?)

2008-01-21 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Mon, 2008-01-21 at 10:13 +0100, Jay Vaughan wrote: Or, if from the get go it would have been included in the mainline kernel source (after submitting it to the proper channels, etc, etc - difficult but not impossible. Out of mainline kernel drivers have always been a pain...). There

Re: [LAD] alsa and OSS (again?)

2008-01-20 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 21:20 +0100, Albert Graef wrote: Dave Phillips wrote: You can look at Albert's patches to see what he fixed that enabled a clean compile. Well, besides the lack of 64 bit support, what makes Midishare so hard to compile and install on Linux right now, is mostly

Re: [LAD] Traverso 0.40.0 Released

2007-06-13 Thread Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 14:26 +0200, Remon wrote: Traverso 0.40.0 Release Announcement The Traverso development team is pleased to announce the release of Traverso 0.40.0 Traverso is a cross platform multitrack audio recording and editing suite with a clean and innovative interface