Ok, I will try and wrap this up in a week or so. Thanks for all of your
responses! I'll leave this open for another week, and then I'll close it
down and start working on the results. If there's anyone who hasn't filled
this out, I'd greatly appreciate it if you did :)
Cheers everyone!
On Tue,
Thanks for filling it out! I guess it's up to me to turn it into something
more useful than that then (although I believe even that is a good result,
because I don't necessarily think most users know that as it is now) :)
___
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Hey everyone!
In an effort to eventually bridge the gap between users and developers, and
specifically explore the contributions users that aren't programmers can
make to free and open source software, I have designed a short survey for
active developers.
More information and the survey itself
Harry, Devin, and the other people who have filled out the survey so far -
thank you very very much! I'm really hoping this can turn into something
productive! :)
Merry christmas!
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Devin Anderson
surfacepatte...@gmail.comwrote:
On Dec 23, 2013 9:06 AM, Gabbe
Hey Harry!
Didn't have time to check the project out too much yet, but man, your
toolkit for the graphics looks _great_! Is that your own invention
entirely? I can only wish people start using that, really clean.
Cheers!
On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Harry van Haaren
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Devin Anderson surfacepatte...@gmail.comwrote:
HI Gabbe,
I hadn't considered this. If I created such a survey, I would be
concerned that my own bias would be injected into the questions
themselves. Can you suggest a few sample questions that might exist
Like said before, I think alot of user feedback could be gained if just
there was a simple way to do it, and people got reminded.
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Michael Bechard gothma...@yahoo.com wrote:
I second the frustration on a lack of user feedback...
Michael
Let's hope this turns into a productive thread and not a flamewar, because
I think this really has potential.
My comments will be the way I see it, and how I understand it from other
musicians I've talked to about Linux audio and music production in general.
Generally, what I think is that what
Short reply to you Devin. I agree with everything you write. A couple of
thoughts on how to adress some of the issues you raise:
User feedback. I always try and provide feedback and suggestions for
whatever I use, and I enjoy doing it too. I think alot of users would like
to do this too, but two
Sounds awesome!
I haven't tried it in other then Ardour3 (which is also alpha) so I will
try it more extensively soon as I get time. I really appreciate you
prioritizing the TripleOSC and very much looking forward to that synth,
aswell as trying the LB303 more.
The modular approach sounds very
Hello!
What's the state of LB303? I'm trying to use it but I guess it's not done
yet? Just checking if I'm just too noob to make it work =)
Regards,
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 2:06 AM, Paul Giblock pgib...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes. And 3xOsc is the next one I am implementing.
Hello!
LMMS's Trippleoscillator is one of my favourite instruments on Linux, but
LMMS isn't my favourite pick of production tool. I've looked around and
noticed that it's only availible internally in LMMS, which poses some
difficulties since LMMS (to my knowledge) cannot be synced with jack-clock
12 matches
Mail list logo
