On 10/29/2013 05:26 PM, Charles Z Henry wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Robin Gareus ro...@gareus.org wrote:
The system will be activated on 31/Oct/2013 if not vetoed. The actual
rate-limit may also be adjusted over time to reflect list-behaviour.
yours truly,
robin
So, I've
On Thursday 31 October 2013 11:12:13 Robin Gareus wrote:
On 10/29/2013 05:26 PM, Charles Z Henry wrote:
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Robin Gareus ro...@gareus.org wrote:
The system will be activated on 31/Oct/2013 if not vetoed. The actual
rate-limit may also be adjusted over time to
On 10/31/2013 04:19 PM, drew Roberts wrote:
[..]
Have the lists history been mined to see how many valuable users violate
this proposed policy one some days? Perhaps they go a week and then have 20
posts in one day and then go another week?
Mined, no. The problem here is the definition of
On Oct 31, 2013, at 11:19 22, drew Roberts wrote:
Have the lists history been mined to see how many valuable users violate
this proposed policy one some days? Perhaps they go a week and then have 20
posts in one day and then go another week?
FWIW, this tends to be my own usage pattern -- a
On 10/31/2013 05:32 PM, Fred Gleason wrote:
[..]
Might we want to consider modifying this rule so as to apply to a
dozen messages *in a given thread* per day? I agree that, if one is
doing that much shouting about a single topic, it'd probably be
better to give it a rest. :)
That was the
Am 31.10.2013 17:51, schrieb Robin Gareus:
On 10/31/2013 05:32 PM, Fred Gleason wrote:
[..]
Might we want to consider modifying this rule so as to apply to a
dozen messages *in a given thread* per day? I agree that, if one is
doing that much shouting about a single topic, it'd probably be
