On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 14:29:46 -0800 (PST), Len Ovens wrote:
>I also wish I was 30 years younger with todays knowledge...
In my opinion knowledge means less. More important IMO is the
motivation, the skills to use free time.
I wish I would be 30 years younger with the gear I own today. For
On Sun, 20 Jan 2019, Will J Godfrey wrote:
More details
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDyXDeLbmeE
Following on, I think our biggest problem is going to be actually getting the
data into a computer. I can't imagine a practical way either ALSA or JACK can
be modified to accept it.
The video
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 21:39:59 +
Will J Godfrey wrote:
>On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 13:26:55 -0800 (PST)
>Len Ovens wrote:
>
>>In fact MIDI 2 seems to be a thing mostly for non-kb instruments or computer
>>generated material (most of which is probably using CV instead of MIDI
>>anyway).
>>
>>MIDI 1
PS regarding robot pianos:
A workaround for one issue would be to select different velocity curves
by a CC message, to fit to different parts of a song played by a piano
master class. Software even could transmit measuring probe data from
the robot piano to the software via MIDI 1 to determine an
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 18:31:29 -0800 (PST), Len Ovens wrote:
>Being able to pitch change each note separately. Having many more CCs.
>Just to name a few. Guitar to MIDI can make good use of it.
I'm playing a Roland GR-55 guitar synth. It has got a MIDI input, but
it does not recognize note numbers.
On Sun, 20 Jan 2019, Ralf Mattes wrote:
In terms of velocity vs. amplitude I would guess that 127 levels at 1db
per level covers more than most ADC's would show. At .5db per level the
range is still probably wider than the dynamic range available in a nice
quiet studio/sound stage... so I would
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019, Ralf Mattes wrote:
Well, it all depends :-)
I my world there's a group of users for whose field standard MIDI just does'nt
work: teaching
and researching professional piano playing. The main obstacle is (the missing)
velocity/volume/attack speed
resolution. So our
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 13:26:55 -0800 (PST) Len wrote:
> While the 5pin din may be gone (not really, musicians like vintage
> gear)
i would not even denote the 5-pin DIN as "legacy" - it is still
the de-facto standard by the fact that nothing else has replaced it
within its niche (USB is a generic
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 13:26:55 -0800 (PST)
Len Ovens wrote:
>In fact MIDI 2 seems to be a thing mostly for non-kb instruments or computer
>generated material (most of which is probably using CV instead of MIDI anyway).
>
>MIDI 1 was huge, My DX7 supported MIDI before the spec was complete. It is
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019, Will Godfrey wrote:
I've just been told about this.
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 12:20:23 +0100 Ralf wrote:
> So if your app works well with the current MIDI, you don't need to
> migrate to MIDI 2.0.
oh, how true that resonates
i am just amazed at how many people are obsessed with novelty and would
disagree with that (perfectly reasonable and accurate)
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 09:47:56 +, Will Godfrey wrote:
>I've just been told about this.
12 matches
Mail list logo
