I was afraid it would be too good the be true :(
You're quite right that the linearity needs to be good and at high gain,
however I'd be inclined to use a passive 20dB per step attenuator on the front
to maintain a good overload margin.
Ah. Indeed, 384 kHz output is now not expensive at all
On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 09:00:16 -0800 (PST)
Len Ovens wrote:
>On Mon, 7 Jan 2019, Jonathan E. Brickman wrote:
>
>> How about 32bit with 384kHz sampling? Boxes like these are starting to
>> spring
>> up.
>>
>> https://www.amazon.com/GUSTARD-U12-384KHz-Digital-Interface/dp/B00PU3R6KY
>
>That box
On Mon, 7 Jan 2019, Jonathan E. Brickman wrote:
How about 32bit with 384kHz sampling? Boxes like these are starting to spring
up.
https://www.amazon.com/GUSTARD-U12-384KHz-Digital-Interface/dp/B00PU3R6KY
That box is output only. That seems to be quite common that is there
is a consumme
On 11/30/18 5:11 PM, Will Godfrey wrote:
I've just read an item on "The Register" about a network connected high
performance oscilloscope... with no security. That's as in Zero, None, Keine.
That might not seem a big deal, except that this sort of kit tends to reside in
research labs, so evilCo
