Re: [LAD] pipewire

2022-01-18 Thread Will Godfrey
On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 08:08:56 -0800 (PST) Len Ovens wrote: >Pipewire does use all the system bits that puleaudio does, such as dbus >and of course systemd. I do not think it will run without. If it *requires* systemd then that is a non-starter for me :( -- Will J Godfrey

Re: [LAD] pipewire

2022-01-18 Thread Len Ovens
On Tue, 18 Jan 2022, Will Godfrey wrote: On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 08:08:56 -0800 (PST) Len Ovens wrote: Pipewire does use all the system bits that puleaudio does, such as dbus and of course systemd. I do not think it will run without. If it *requires* systemd then that is a non-starter for me

Re: [LAD] pipewire

2022-01-18 Thread Len Ovens
On Mon, 17 Jan 2022, Fons Adriaensen wrote: I'd like to test pipewire as a replacement for Jack (on Arch), How do I tell pipewire to use e.g. hw:3,0 and make all of its 64 channels appear as capture/playback ports in qjackctl ? Note: I do not have anything PulseAudio (like pavucontrol)

Re: [LAD] pipewire

2022-01-18 Thread Wim Taymans
Hi Fons, As a bare minimum you would need pipewire (the daemon) and pipewire-jack (the libjack.so client implementation). With a custom config file you can make this work exactly like jack (see below). The way PipeWire normally works is that when starting the daemon, nothing is in the graph.

Re: [LAD] pipewire

2022-01-18 Thread Wim Taymans
On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 at 16:03, Lorenzo Sutton wrote: > > My problem with that set-up is that it seemed that something like Ardour > would need to be explicitly run via pw-jack so e.g. > > pw-jack ardour > You distro probably also has a package that puts the pipewire libjack.so in LD_LIBRARY

Re: [LAD] pipewire

2022-01-18 Thread Will Godfrey
On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 19:16:39 +0100 Wim Taymans wrote: >Hi Fons, > >As a bare minimum you would need pipewire (the daemon) and >pipewire-jack (the libjack.so client implementation). With a custom >config file you can make this work exactly like jack (see below). Thanks for this info :) -- Will

Re: [LAD] pipewire

2022-01-18 Thread Wim Taymans
On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 at 17:15, Will Godfrey wrote: > >and of course systemd. I do not think it will run without. It does run fine without systemd. > > If it *requires* systemd then that is a non-starter for me :( > It doesn't require systemd. You can compile with systemd support and then you