Re: [LAD] How well do thinkpad notebooks work for audio?

2009-07-30 Thread hollunder
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:01:23 +0800 Ray Rashif schivmeis...@gmail.com wrote: Damned right..gotta watch out for that ricoh fw chip. I got the suggestion to forget about firewire and look at expresscard solutions instead. This shouldn't have the same problem as it's just PCIe, or so I've heard.

Re: [LAD] How well do thinkpad notebooks work for audio?

2009-07-30 Thread Arnold Krille
On Thursday 30 July 2009 09:50:01 hollun...@gmx.at wrote: So if you need a power source anyway there's not much reason to use FW besides maybe being a little bit more flexible than with expresscard. Ever tried to connect several expresscard sounddevices at once? With firewire it is _really_

Re: [LAD] How well do thinkpad notebooks work for audio?

2009-07-30 Thread Florian Faber
Arnold Krille wrote: On Thursday 30 July 2009 09:50:01 hollun...@gmx.at wrote: So if you need a power source anyway there's not much reason to use FW besides maybe being a little bit more flexible than with expresscard. Ever tried to connect several expresscard sounddevices at once? The

Re: [LAD] How well do thinkpad notebooks work for audio?

2009-07-30 Thread hollunder
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:14:14 +0200 Arnold Krille arn...@arnoldarts.de wrote: On Thursday 30 July 2009 09:50:01 hollun...@gmx.at wrote: So if you need a power source anyway there's not much reason to use FW besides maybe being a little bit more flexible than with expresscard. Ever tried

Re: [LAD] How well do thinkpad notebooks work for audio?

2009-07-30 Thread Ralf Mardorf
The question here is: Which ones are the broken ones and which ones the good ones? I wouldn't know where to look for that info, do you? I would never trust any list for hardware that should be fine with Linux, ensures there will be some revision that isn't fine. I guess you need to

Re: [LAD] Test app for LADSPA plugins

2009-07-30 Thread Damon Chaplin
Hi, I've tracked down all the issues spotted by my test app and emailed all the maintainers. So hopefully they'll get fixed. I've tried the demolition test app as well. The output isn't too clear so I've summarised the major issues spotted: Demolition Findings CALF 34049 Calf MultiChorus

Re: [LAD] Test app for LADSPA plugins

2009-07-30 Thread Grammostola Rosea
Damon Chaplin wrote: Hi, I've tracked down all the issues spotted by my test app and emailed all the maintainers. So hopefully they'll get fixed. Great work! We need good plugins! :) Regards. \r ___ Linux-audio-dev mailing list

Re: [LAD] Test app for LADSPA plugins

2009-07-30 Thread hollunder
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:49:42 +0200 Grammostola Rosea rosea.grammost...@gmail.com wrote: Damon Chaplin wrote: Hi, I've tracked down all the issues spotted by my test app and emailed all the maintainers. So hopefully they'll get fixed. Great work! We need good plugins! :) Regards.

Re: [LAD] Test app for LADSPA plugins

2009-07-30 Thread Damon Chaplin
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 11:55 +0200, xmag wrote: Hi, I wrote all the Glame* filters, did you send me an email, and if, where did you send it :-) I sent Steve Harris an email about some issues in the swh plugins, but no problems were spotted in the Glame* filters by my test app. What is

Re: [LAD] Test app for LADSPA plugins

2009-07-30 Thread Steve Harris
On 30 Jul 2009, at 10:34, Damon Chaplin wrote: CMT 1226 Phase Modulated Voice all input controls FLOAT MAX: Watchdog timeout 1849 Logistic Map Control Generator all input controls FLOAT MIN: Watchdog timeout 1221 Analogue Voice all input controls FLOAT MAX: Watchdog timeout SWH 1605

Re: [LAD] LV2 test apps?

2009-07-30 Thread Damon Chaplin
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 11:27 +0100, james morris wrote: Are there any similar testing tools for LV2 plugins? Although I'm familiar with gdb and valgrind, I don't know how to go about using these with plugins, and I guess/assume a simple host (perhaps one specifically designed for testing)

Re: [LAD] LV2 test apps?

2009-07-30 Thread David Robillard
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 11:27 +0100, james morris wrote: On 30/7/2009, Damon Chaplin da...@karuna.eclipse.co.uk wrote: Hi, I've tracked down all the issues spotted by my test app and emailed all the maintainers. So hopefully they'll get fixed. I've tried the demolition test app as well. The

Re: [LAD] [LAA] [ANN] guitarix-0.05.0-1 released

2009-07-30 Thread LangageMachine
2009/7/27 hollun...@gmx.at Thanks, it's great, I just plunked some bass through it and it's a lot of fun. Arch User Repository is updated. Or is it ? I cannot see guitarix at http://repos.archaudio.org/testing/i686/ ? Cheers. ___ Linux-audio-dev

Re: [LAD] [LAA] [ANN] guitarix-0.05.0-1 released

2009-07-30 Thread hollunder
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:38:01 + LangageMachine langagemach...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/7/27 hollun...@gmx.at Thanks, it's great, I just plunked some bass through it and it's a lot of fun. Arch User Repository is updated. Or is it ? I cannot see guitarix at

Re: [LAD] [LAA] [ANN] guitarix-0.05.0-1 released

2009-07-30 Thread LangageMachine
2009/7/30 hollun...@gmx.at You confused the Arch User Repository (AUR) with the archaudio repo. I'm not yet putting my stuff into the archaudio repo. It can easily built from AUR: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=26972 Oh yes, silly me ! Thanks for the heads up ! Cheers.

Re: [LAD] FFADO Contact Needed

2009-07-30 Thread Jonathan Woithe
Hi Alex On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:42:02 you wrote: I have tried the contact form on the FFADO website and through the email address provided in the contact pages at the SourceForge.net project page to no avail. I'm not sure where else to ask except here. Are any of the FFADO developers on this