Just tried to run a mididing [sic?] with Boost 1.60. Using the latest git
of mididings. Got this:
TypeError: No to_python (by-value) converter found for C++ type:
boost::shared_ptr
I found many similar reports with other tools, all referencing Boost 1.60,
all talking about reverts to Boost
On 3/11/2016 7:41 AM, Robin Gareus wrote:
On 03/11/2016 02:24 PM, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
According to Jonathan his multiple cores are barely reaching 5% usage. How
can JACK_DSP be so high when there is so much room left to play with if
JACK2 is handling the parallelism correctly?
It seems
although it isn't proven yet .. i think that your problem may
come from the fact that you want to have 19 different engines,
and you keep flicking switches to go from one to the other.
Nope, I don't want to switch engines. Everything runs at once, and
runs very well by the
On 3/11/2016 9:57 AM, Paul Davis wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Jonathan Brickman
<j...@ponderworthy.com <mailto:j...@ponderworthy.com>> wrote:
Indeed -- except that cars in Manhattan are restricted to using
wheels :-) I have rocket engines which don't give
the "engines" i'm referring to are your many multiple clients (19 or so).
OK, I think I see what you are referring to: the switching nature of the
client list, where the JACK server has to switch between. And this is
entirely why it helps to run multiple JACK servers on multiple
On 3/1/2016 11:40 AM, Paul Davis wrote:
the JACK implementation relies on two things to work:
* pointer and integer operations are (weakly) atomic on all
platforms that JACK runs on
* code reordering will either not happen or will be prevented by
the compiler
Does #2 mean that -O3
I am finding myself motivated to convert from Python 2.7 to Python 3, and I
just realized that PyJack, the Python JACK library I have been using, has
not been set up for Python 3. Anyone have a favorite JACK library for
Python3?
--
*Jonathan E. Brickman j...@ponderworthy.com
Greetings, Wim. Amazing project you have there. I hope you succeed. Len
has covered lots of excellent thoughts. Here are a few more, clearly
intersecting.
First of all, it's a great idea. I'd love to see one layer which could do
all of JACK and pulse. But the pitfalls are many :-) It's
Not really sure the subgraph is so good -- one of the things JACK gives us
is the extremely solid knowledge of what it just did, is doing now, and
will do next period. If I run Pulse with JACK, it's JACK controlling the
hardware and Pulse feeding into it, not the other way around, because Pulse
Alexandre, what library/libraries/code base are you using for
MIDI-over-TCP? Can you give a URL or two?
J.E.B.
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 2:39 PM Alexandre Ratchov wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 01, 2018 at 04:49:48PM -0500, Jonathan E. Brickman wrote:
> >
> > I had not realized that TCP could produce
Christopher, would you mind giving a command-line example or two? I tried
many and also googled a bit, did not find a working way to use
jack_property to list or set anything :-) Just for starters, how do you
get the UUID of a process?
J.E.B.
On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 7:33 AM Christopher Arndt
That is likely to change depending on GCC optimization setting, no?
J.E.B.
On Sat, Mar 16, 2019, 5:12 PM wrote:
> Will Godfrey:
> > On Wed, 13 Mar 2019 00:09:17 +0100 (CET)
> > k...@aspodata.se wrote:
> >
> > >Will Godfrey:
> > >> Does anyone know if GCC will replace power of 2
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
