On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 11:09:06PM +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
You again.
Yes, me. I was told by some members of this list only a few days
ago that sarcasm was OK.
Where did I say I would have problems with sarcasm?
But the use of sarcasm doesn't make your comment any bit
more
On Fri, 2004-06-25 at 23:15, Pete Bessman wrote:
At Fri, 25 Jun 2004 18:00:42 +0200,
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
Dave Griffiths said something above about hiding functionality for
the users to find. That, to, is just wrong. This isn't a videogame
or Where's Waldo.
heh heh, funnily enough - I
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 07:55:50PM -0400, Pete Bessman wrote:
At Fri, 25 Jun 2004 23:28:35 +0200,
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
so that I can compare it against the mouth-breathing crow-magnon
music created with shiny-quarter interfaces. I'm sure the results
will speak for themselves.
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 01:33:59AM -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
Designing for usability is not rocket science. For the phone example,
the options (in decreasing order of desirability) are:
1. A self-explanatory pictorial representation.
2. A text label.
3. An
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 01:41:17AM +0100, Dave Griffiths wrote:
Having worked professionally on related things, I just can't stand the
I HAVE to understand everything about an interface in 5 SECONDS!
attitude to gui design. People can learn things, it's part of playing
music on real
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 09:36:26AM +0200, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
I made the observation that educated people usually do not mind having
to learn something. So if there is a widespread aversion to having to
learn and read a manual, that seems to indicate that education levels
have gone down.
On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 02:36, Fons Adriaensen wrote:
I made the observation that educated people usually do not mind having
to learn something. So if there is a widespread aversion to having to
learn and read a manual, that seems to indicate that education levels
have gone down.
I
On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 17:38:24 -0500
Jan Depner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2004-06-25 at 13:49, Tim Blechmann wrote:
I have a denormal fix without a branch but you probably don't want
to see it ;-)
It's pretty simple, just OR the bits of the exponent together
which gives either
At Sat, 26 Jun 2004 01:41:17 +0100,
Dave Griffiths wrote:
I HAVE to understand everything about an interface in 5 SECONDS!
attitude to gui design. People can learn things, it's part of
playing music on real instruments - why can't it be part of playing
computer instruments?
I simply don't
At Sat, 26 Jun 2004 09:36:26 +0200,
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
What is normal ?
Why do you think I put it in quotes?
I have an increasing difficulty in just understanding what you try
to say. Could you explain the terms
No.
- crow-magnon (sic) music
I'm amazed that your purportedly
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 11:50:29AM -0400, Pete Bessman wrote:
Great, well, I made the observation that the intelligentsia have
microscopic genitalia. (What, you want my data? Surely you jest.)
Ergo, the smarter a person claims to be, the greater the magnification
they require at the urinal.
hi all,
I'm starting some work with audio applications on Familiar for the IPAQ.
I was wondering if anybody here can point me in the direction of some
fixed-point audio software for investigative purposes.
Probably the holy grail of fixed-point audio would be a fixed-point MP3
or OGG encoder.
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 01:18:42 +0200
derek holzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anybody working on a fixed-point version of Ecasound, BTW? I've seen it
already runs on the IPAQ, just very slowly... What about other harddisk
recorders using fixed point?
I have a very good start on a recorder for
13 matches
Mail list logo
