hi all..
i'm trying to sleep for some very low time slices ... about 100 to 1000
us ...
but i can't get below about 1 ms ... are there any workarounds to sleep
for very small time slices?
i tested nanosleep(), usleep() and select(0, 0, 0, 0, timout) ...
thanks tim
--
mailto:[EMAIL
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 22:58 +0200, Tim Blechmann wrote:
hi all..
i'm trying to sleep for some very low time slices ... about 100 to 1000
us ...
but i can't get below about 1 ms ... are there any workarounds to sleep
for very small time slices?
You can't sleep less than 1ms because that
i'm trying to sleep for some very low time slices ... about 100 to 1000
us ...
but i can't get below about 1 ms ... are there any workarounds to sleep
for very small time slices?
i tested nanosleep(), usleep() and select(0, 0, 0, 0, timout) ...
on a normal kernel, there's no way around this. the
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 17:50 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
i'm trying to sleep for some very low time slices ... about 100 to 1000
us ...
but i can't get below about 1 ms ... are there any workarounds to sleep
for very small time slices?
i tested nanosleep(), usleep() and select(0, 0, 0, 0,
Why do you say it's only a possibility? AFAIK the high res timer patch
works fine on most hardware...
the last person i know to try (it was some time ago) was jesse
chappell, and it messed up other things on his system in subtle but
noticeable ways.
the kernel may also impose limits on user
