Stefan Nitschke wrote:
I like this idea (particularly because accidentally downloading
proprietary garbage won't happen, *ahemRTSynth/digeridooahem*).
No problem, I canceled any support for Linux from now until ever.
I would understand if you canceled any support for the author of the
Pall Thayer wrote:
Actually, if I recall correctly, SCO vs Daimler is a breach of contract
case. They're suing Daimler Chrysler because they failed to send info on
their use of Unix as per the contract at the time, however DC hasn't
used the system for several years.
This was and is about
Lee Revell wrote:
Christ, what the fuck country do you live in? Don't you understand the
concept of people having bills to pay? Or do you just assume the RME
guys are independenly wealthy and just design sound cards for fun?
Interestingly some people seem to be existing who are working on
Paul Davis wrote:
its not that clear. according to the timeline provided at Ircam,
Patcher, the predecessor of Max, was started in 1986. i don't know
if patcher had a visual dataflow model or not. Max itself didn't exist
till 1990.
Miller Puckette (the creator of Patcher and PD) probably
Unfortunately Manuel Op de Coul, the author of Scala
(http://www.xs4all.nl/~huygensf/scala/), currently does not want to change his
non-commercial license (perhaps in the future). But he made this offer:
However if someone makes a Debian package for it, I'll be happy to distribute
it.
Scala is
Paul Brossier wrote:
as it is there is no point for the debian project to have it,
even in non-free.
That is correct. The request was not to add it to Debian but only to help
creating a Debian package (a .deb file).
will having a debian package for it make him change his mind
about the
I had already read that. Which effects can be predicted?
Cheers,
Andreas
- Original Message -
From: Dave Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LAD Mail linux-audio-dev@music.columbia.edu; LAU Mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 3:06 PM
Subject: [linux-audio-dev] Steinberg
UPnP (http://upnp.org) seems to have been adopted by many/most producers of
audio streaming devices. I am looking for Open Source Media Server software for
Linux which is accessable by UPnP AV Media Renderers. Any suggestions?
Interesting material which I have found so far:
Overview of UPnP AV
Dubphil wrote:
Recently I have succeeded in convicing a Manufacturer (Wave Idea) to
consider the importance of giving Linux support to his products. I was
really convince myself that this initiative will be encouraged by the
Linux Audio community. That's why I have posted an help request to
I finally found the request. I was looking for Wave Idea instead of WaveIdea
...
I have replied to Dubphil by private mail.
Cheers,
Andreas
- Original Message -
From: Andreas Kuckartz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: The Linux Audio Developers' Mailing List
linux-audio-dev@music.columbia.edu
Sent
Did you have a look at GNU Solfege (http://www.solfege.org/) ?
(It is not a C++ library but you can do ear training with it :-)
Cheers,
Andreas
- Original Message -
From: Jeffrey Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: linux-audio-dev@music.columbia.edu
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2005 6:22 AM
Paul Davis wrote:
i don't entirely understand how the bridgeco h/w is relevant to a
communication protocol between, say, a PreSonus audio interface and a
computer running linux. can anyone enlighten me?
BridgeCo's Breakout Box solutions are ready-to-go reference designs for
manufacturers of
but if the 1394 interface on my computer doesn't use a BridgeCo chip,
yet still recieves the data from the wire, isn't this a protocol
issue, not a h/w issue?
It *should* be but unfortunately it seems to be similar to the situation with
USB audio hardware. I do not know who can be blamed for
oliver oli wrote:
how many people are using demudi after how many
years of development? it is a waste of money...
Obviously oliver oli does not know what he is talking about.
Andreas
One could think about using 3D graphics hardware for audio DSP purposes. There
are commercial projects which do that (only for Windows AFAIK).
Cheers,
Andreas
- Original Message -
From: David Olofson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: The Linux Audio Developers' Mailing List
, 2005 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Linux DSP Hardware?
Steve Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 11:11:25 +0100, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
One could think about using 3D graphics hardware for audio DSP
purposes. There are commercial projects which do that (only
Who is we?
Does marketed to hardware OEMs imply that this is a commercial project?
What is the (intended) relation/difference to DeMuDi?
Cheers,
Andreas
- Original Message -
From: Daniel James [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Linux Audio Announce list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 02,
RTFF (Read The Fine FAQ), please.
See:
Does the GPL allow me to distribute a modified or beta version under a
nondisclosure agreement?
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#DoesTheGPLAllowNDA
Does the GPL allow me to develop a modified version under a nondisclosure
agreement?
Try version 0.5.5:
http://www.alsa-project.org/~iwai/alsa.html#LatencyTest
There is a syntax error in showtrace.c but it is pretty obvious how to correct
it.
Cheers,
Andreas
- Original Message -
From: Paul Winkler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: linux-audio-dev@music.columbia.edu
Sent: Thursday,
Alfons Adriaensen wrote:
... - I've only taken a few bits from other people, and it's
generally involved them sending me something they've written, and then
me re-writing it because it's not done in quite the way I like it!
...
2. The quote above is quite informative IMHO. This type
Those who are interested in licensing issues and questions might want to RTF
(Read The FAQ) before asking specific questions here:
Frequently Asked Questions about the GNU GPL
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html
MySQL and OpenOffice are well known projects using some kind of dual licensing.
Mario Lang wrote:
Clue me in, I've never seen any reference to .jackdrc yet.
Right now, you'd customize the jack group in Emacs to change
default startup options? Does ~/.jackdrc get read by jackd?
Is it documented somewhere?
There is a paragraph at the end of this page:
Jens M Andreasen wrote:
The ensemble is off by at least 5hz occasionally. It sounds like your
oscillators are getting payed to do the job in spite of deeply hating
contemporary music.
That is the funniest formulation I have read for months.
Cheers,
Andreas
Lee Revell wrote::
Do you have any evidence that anyone has ever made this work?
This probably does not count as evidence but it is on the list of
devices supported by FreeBoB:
http://freebob.sourceforge.net/index.php/List_of_Supported_Devices
Cheers,
Andreas
Dave Phillips or Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
Unfortunately I haven't found an existing open source license which
would reflect those restrictions. Some even said this wouldn't be an
open source license according to definitions of XY, but personally I
think it would.
I suggest that you read
I have a simple question:
Which companies are (or have been) distributing LinuxSampler as part of
a package also including hardware and/or proprietary software?
Cheers,
Andreas
---
Paul Davis wrote:
On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 10:22 +1000, Ryan Heise wrote:
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 05:55:11PM
26 matches
Mail list logo
