On Thu, 10 Dec 2015, Will J Godfrey wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 06:51:48 -0800 (PST)
Len Ovens wrote:
You can check if there are 4 bytes available, if not don't read (yet).
Normally (at least for anything I have done) the reason I use the ring
buffer is to divorce the data
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 06:51:48 -0800 (PST)
Len Ovens wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Dec 2015, Will J Godfrey wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:07:25 -0500
> > Paul Davis wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Will Godfrey
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Will Godfrey
wrote:
> If I have a buffer size of 256 and always use a 4 byte data block, can I be
> confident that reads and writes will either transfer the correct number
> of bytes or none at all?
>
You cannot.
If I have a buffer size of 256 and always use a 4 byte data block, can I be
confident that reads and writes will either transfer the correct number
of bytes or none at all?
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
Say you have a poem and I have a tune.
Exchange them and we can both have a
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015, Will J Godfrey wrote:
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:07:25 -0500
Paul Davis wrote:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Will Godfrey
wrote:
If I have a buffer size of 256 and always use a 4 byte data block, can I be